Every category where a model named Chargebee for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Billing and subscription management	Revenue operations	58%	1 of 57	13%	63	endorsed leader

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Chargebee yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Chargebee across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	2	0	1	0	3
GPT-5.4 mini	1	1	1	1	4
Gemini 3.5 Flash	4	1	0	1	6
Perplexity Sonar	2	0	2	1	5
Grok 4.1 Fast	4	1	1	0	6
Mistral Small	3	2	1	0	6
DeepSeek V4 Flash	2	3	0	1	6
Llama 4 Maverick	1	1	2	0	4
Qwen 3.7 Flash	4	1	0	1	6
Kimi K2	4	0	0	1	5
GLM 4.7 FlashX	3	2	0	1	6
MiniMax M2.5	4	0	1	1	6

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct33 labels15

Paraphrase27 labels18

Comparative36 labels7not counted in share

Budget-constrained23 labels3

Scale-constrained24 labels10

Negative34 labels4not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative177 labels in all, every segment counted; 46 of the 57 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Chargebee | Flexible pricing, integrations | 4.4/5 | 0.75% volume (free start) | Dunning, rev rec, 100+ integrations; great for experimentation.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Billing · scale prompt · first choice

“Start with Chargebee or Stripe Billing as they offer the best balance of features, pricing, and ease of implementation for a 500-person company.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Billing · scale prompt · first choice

“The Best for $0 Upfront: Chargebee (Starter Plan) ... Chargebee lets you launch with professional subscription management ... for $0.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Billing · budget prompt · first choice

“For most mid-sized B2B companies, Chargebee offers the best balance of features, scalability, ease of setup, and reasonable pricing.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Billing · paraphrase prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Who should avoid it: Fast-growing SaaS companies that might exceed plan thresholds without realizing it” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Billing · negative prompt · hard negative

“Avoid complex orchestrators like Chargebee or Zuora early on” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Billing · negative prompt · hard negative

“often a good SMB option, but it is usually chosen more for breadth of features than for being the absolute cheapest” Perplexity Sonar · Billing · budget prompt · soft negative

“it can get expensive quickly... The Trap: Once you cross certain monthly thresholds” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Billing · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Chargebee, over the 177 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Chargebee was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Stripe Billing159 of 17738Compare →

Recurly123 of 1772Compare →

Zuora111 of 17730Not in the top three

Maxio92 of 1773Not in the top three

Paddle80 of 1772Not in the top three

Zoho Billing30 of 1775Not in the top three

Metronome23 of 1770Not in the top three

Billsby20 of 1774Not in the top three

Zoho Subscriptions18 of 1773Not in the top three

Younium18 of 1771Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Chargebee. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 35 of the 177 answers that named Chargebee and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

solidgate.com19

whop.com16

younium.com16

learn.g2.com13

chargebee.comYour site11

zoneandco.com11

guideflow.com10

stripe.com10

withorb.com10

g2.com9

114 of the 125 domain citations in answers naming Chargebee came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

solidgate.com/blog/best-subscription-billing-software19

whop.com/blog/subscription-billing-software16

younium.com/blog/subscription-billing-platforms15

learn.g2.com/best-subscription-management-software13

zoneandco.com/articles/20-best-subscription-billing-platforms-for-different-use-cases11

ventureharbour.com/subscription-billing-platforms9

upflow.io/blog/saas-finance/saas-best-billing-software8

guideflow.com/blog/subscription-billing-software7

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Chargebee

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Chargebee; a claim can dispute any of them.

Chargebee (Starter Plan) 1Chargebee Starter 1

The company

Q141009096 is the company behind Chargebee.

Website: chargebee.com
Headquarters: North Bethesda, United States
Founded: 2011

From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Chargebee's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Chargebee, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at chargebee.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.