Every category where a model named Maxio for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Billing and subscription management	Revenue operations	0%	11 of 57	12%	40	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Maxio yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Maxio across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	2	1	1	4
GPT-5.4 mini	1	1	0	2
Gemini 3.5 Flash	4	0	0	4
Perplexity Sonar	1	1	0	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	3	1	0	4
Mistral Small	4	0	0	4
DeepSeek V4 Flash	3	1	2	6
Llama 4 Maverick	0	2	0	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	2	0	1	3
Kimi K2	3	0	1	4
GLM 4.7 FlashX	3	0	0	3
MiniMax M2.5	2	0	0	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct24 labels2

Paraphrase20 labels2

Comparative25 labelsNone

Budget-constrained6 labels1

Scale-constrained13 labelsNone

Negative13 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative101 labels in all, every segment counted; 5 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If your billing decisions are driven by the CFO or finance department rather than developers, Maxio is often the top choice.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Billing · direct prompt · alternative

“if revenue recognition and CFO-grade financial reporting are your #1 priority, Maxio may edge it out” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Billing · direct prompt · alternative

“Maxio (Chargify + SaaSOptics) | B2B SaaS with quote-to-cash | Combines billing + revenue recognition” Kimi K2 · Billing · comparative prompt · alternative

“Finance-focused platform for B2B SaaS that integrates billing with financial planning and SaaS metrics” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Billing · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“enterPrise pricing, overkill” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Billing · budget prompt · hard negative

“Generally too expensive for tight budgets, but offer specific startup discounts.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Billing · budget prompt · soft negative

“Maxio starts at $599/month for up to $100K in monthly billings” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Billing · budget prompt · soft negative

“Proceed with Caution ... Poor customer support since merger” Kimi K2 · Billing · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Maxio, over the 101 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Maxio was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Chargebee92 of 10127Not in the top three

Stripe Billing85 of 10130Not in the top three

Zuora77 of 10124Not in the top three

Recurly75 of 1012Not in the top three

Paddle49 of 1011Not in the top three

Metronome17 of 1010Not in the top three

Zoho Billing16 of 1011Not in the top three

Younium16 of 1010Not in the top three

BillingPlatform15 of 1010Not in the top three

FastSpring12 of 1010Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Maxio. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 18 of the 101 answers that named Maxio and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

solidgate.com14

younium.com13

learn.g2.com11

whop.com10

zoneandco.com10

upflow.io9

solvimon.com8

guideflow.com7

unibee.dev7

frisbii.com6

Ninety-five of the ninety-five domain citations in answers naming Maxio came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

solidgate.com/blog/best-subscription-billing-software14

younium.com/blog/subscription-billing-platforms13

learn.g2.com/best-subscription-management-software11

whop.com/blog/subscription-billing-software10

zoneandco.com/articles/20-best-subscription-billing-platforms-for-different-use-cases10

upflow.io/blog/saas-finance/saas-best-billing-software9

frisbii.com/blog/the-best-subscription-management-software-tools6

guideflow.com/blog/subscription-management-software6

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Maxio

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Maxio; a claim can dispute any of them.

Chargify/Maxio 1Maxio (Chargify + SaaSOptics) 1Maxio (formerly Chargify & SaaSOptics) 1Maxio (formerly Chargify + SaaSOptics) 1Maxio (formerly SaaSOptics + Chargify) 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Maxio's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Maxio, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at maxio.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.