Every category where a model named BillingPlatform for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Billing and subscription management	Revenue operations	0%	18 of 57	0%	5	under 10 labels · led by Chargebee at 58%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for BillingPlatform yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated BillingPlatform across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	2	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct5 labelsNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative8 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative18 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Specialized in enterprise usage-based billing with configurable revenue management.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Billing · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as BillingPlatform, over the 18 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and BillingPlatform was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Zuora18 of 1810Not in the top three

Chargebee18 of 181Not in the top three

Stripe Billing16 of 183Not in the top three

Maxio15 of 182Not in the top three

Recurly13 of 180Not in the top three

Paddle10 of 180Not in the top three

Younium6 of 180Not in the top three

FastSpring5 of 180Not in the top three

Metronome5 of 180Not in the top three

Orb5 of 180Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named BillingPlatform. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 18 answers that named BillingPlatform and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

billingplatform.comYour site2

solidgate.com2

younium.com2

zoneandco.com2

coldiq.com1

connectpay.com1

dealhub.io1

hyperline.co1

kreante.co1

learn.g2.com1

Twelve of the fourteen domain citations in answers naming BillingPlatform came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

solidgate.com/blog/best-subscription-billing-software2

younium.com/blog/subscription-billing-platforms2

zoneandco.com/articles/20-best-subscription-billing-platforms-for-different-use-cases2

billingplatform.com/1

billingplatform.com/blog/best-usage-based-billing-platforms-enterprise-b2b-saas1

coldiq.com/blog/best-usage-based-billing-software-in-20261

connectpay.com/blog/recurring-payment-software1

dealhub.io/blog/billing/10-best-saas-billing-platforms-for-20261

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when BillingPlatform's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as BillingPlatform, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at billingplatform.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.