Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 16 → 30 of 51
1 category · RankedBillingPlatform
17Judge labels
1First choices
0Negative labels
9 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Billing for enterprise buyers
Rank 32 of 54 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 1 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market32 of 54
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Enterprise6 of 59
2%16 labels
accepted challenger
In billing · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named BillingPlatform for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Billing and subscription management | Revenue operations | 0% | 32 of 54 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Chargebee at 60% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, BillingPlatform held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Billing · by segment
Enterprise▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 9 → 6 of 58
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Billing | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 16 → 32 of 54 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated BillingPlatform across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated BillingPlatform across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct5 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative7 labelsNone
Budget-constrained2 labels1
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative2 labels2not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative17 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
No positive label carried a quote.
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as BillingPlatform, over the 17 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and BillingPlatform was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as BillingPlatform, over the 17 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and BillingPlatform was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named BillingPlatform. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 17 of the 17 answers that named BillingPlatform and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
guideflow.com9
solidgate.com9
whop.com9
learn.g2.com8
viasocket.com7
younium.com7
albato.com6
hyperline.co6
resources.rework.com6
solvimon.com6
Seventy-three of the seventy-three domain citations in answers naming BillingPlatform came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
billingplatform.com ranks 4 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, BillingPlatform takes 0% of first choices and Chargebee takes 60%.ShowHide
Search and answers
billingplatform.com ranks 4 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, BillingPlatform takes 0% of first choices and Chargebee takes 60%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “subscription billing platform”
4
Position for “best subscription billing platform”
7
- Searches for its name, Google
- 590 a month (“billingplatform”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 15 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 41,701 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 4,386 · 464 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,651
- Paid Google search
- 2 searches its ads show for, about 8 clicks and $37 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 32 of 54 in billing
Segment leader
60%
Chargebee
- First choices
- 1 across its categories
- Named in
- 17 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 17 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on billingplatform.com
1,006
subdomains included
Content
795
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
64 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 242 | 6 | 2026-08-27 | CPQ, CRM | |
| News or press | 226 | 4 | 2026-08-18 | ||
| Report or ebook | 117 | 1 | 2026-07-30 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 56 | 3 | 2026-08-19 | CPQ | |
| Conference or event | 47 | 0 | 2026-06-04 | CPQ | |
| Glossary or explainer | 36 | 0 | 2026-04-20 | ||
| Comparison | 29 | 0 | 2026-05-28 | CPQ | |
| Podcast or video | 25 | 0 | 2026-03-01 | ||
| Case study | 16 | 0 | 2021-09-01 | ||
| Template or tool | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-08-27Revenue recognition examples blog
- 2026-08-19Metering for ai products webinar webinar or virtual event
- 2026-08-19How to evaluate a metering rating platform webinar webinar or virtual event
- 2026-08-18Billingplatform leader in gartner magic quadrant third consecutive year news or press
- 2026-08-11Monetization at the speed of conversation webinar webinar or virtual event
- 2026-08-11Billingplatform ranked on inc 5000 list for sixth straight year news or press
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page billingplatform.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow BillingPlatform
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
BillingPlatform is its own company.ShowHide
The company
BillingPlatform is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Monetization for the Modern Enterprise
- For
- enterprises
- Customers named
- New RelicPoint Click CareCCC Intelligent SolutionsTipaltiAdvaniaKipu HealthJPMorgan PaymentsInstacart
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting
What BillingPlatform's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: billingplatform.com, billingplatform.com/platform, billingplatform.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when BillingPlatform's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as BillingPlatform, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for BillingPlatform by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where BillingPlatform is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name BillingPlatform, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.