AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › Conga Composer · October 2026 Edition
Conga · 1 category · Ranked

Conga Composer

27Judge labels
6First choices
2Negative labels
13 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
12% in Proposals for enterprise buyers
Rank 34 of 56 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 1 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentStrongest at enterprise.
In proposals · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Conga Composer for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Proposal softwareRevenue operations0%34 of 560%1under 10 labels · led by PandaDoc at 65%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, Conga Composer held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · Proposals · by segment

Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 56 → 44 of 52
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 22 → 33 of 55
Enterprise▲+3Since September 2026: 7% → 11%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
11%from 7% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 5 → 4 of 62

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Proposals0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 22 → 34 of 56

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Conga Composer across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.2000000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00101
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct6 labels1
Paraphrase7 labels5
Comparative9 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative3 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative27 labels in all, every segment counted; 6 of the 6 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Conga Composer, over the 27 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Conga Composer was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
PandaDoc25 of 275Not among the top eight
Responsive17 of 277Not among the top eight
Loopio13 of 274Not among the top eight
Proposify13 of 270Not among the top eight
Qwilr12 of 271Not among the top eight
DealHub11 of 272Not among the top eight
GetAccept10 of 271Not among the top eight
Upland Qvidian9 of 271Not among the top eight
Salesforce Revenue Cloud3 of 272Not among the top eight
AutogenAI3 of 270Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Conga Composer. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 26 of the 27 answers that named Conga Composer and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

responsive.io16
getaccept.com15
monday.com13
pandadoc.com13
flowcase.com12
loopio.com11
proposify.com10
sifthub.io10
guideflow.com9
inventive.ai9

118 of the 118 domain citations in answers naming Conga Composer came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

conga.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Conga Composer takes 0% of first choices and PandaDoc takes 65%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “proposal software”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best proposal software”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
480 a month (“conga composer”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
26 a month
Its company's site
conga.com shared with Conga's other products; the figures are the site's
Organic visits to its site
about 46,363 a month
Searches its site ranks for
2,418 · 311 in the top three
Sites linking to it
2,867
Paid Google search
8 searches its ads show for, about 42 clicks and $224 a month (estimate)
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
120+ ads · 97 text, 18 video, 5 image · 120 shown in the last 30 days

First shown February 2022, as AppExtremes LLC, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 53 in the year, 67 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 34 of 56 in proposals
Segment leader
65%
PandaDoc
First choices
6 across its categories
Named in
27 answers
Its own site cited
in 26 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Names read as Conga Composer

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Conga Composer; a claim can dispute any of them.
Conga 1

Follow Conga Composer

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Conga is the company behind Conga Composer.
ShowHide
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Conga Composer's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Conga Composer, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Conga Composer by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Conga Composer is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Conga Composer, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at conga.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.