| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pricing optimization | Revenue operations | 0% | 14 of 76 | 14% | 7 | under 10 labels · led by Pricefx at 53% |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“an AI-powered pricing platform that helps B2B manufacturers, distributors, and service organizations maximize revenue and protect margins” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Pricing optimization · direct prompt · alternative
“Conga's Price Optimization & Management (POM) is a highly efficient choice” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Pricing optimization · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“a good fit if you're mid-market but have very complex pricing” GPT-5.4 mini · Pricing optimization · direct prompt · alternative
“Conga Price Optimization - Good AI-driven deal guidance” MiniMax M2.5 · Pricing optimization · paraphrase prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“High Caution – Known for Significant Implementation or Cost Issues ... very steep learning curve, complex implementation ... Not recommended for SMBs or mid-market teams.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Pricing optimization · negative prompt · hard negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 38 of the 38 answers that named Conga Price Optimization & Management and are not a share of its labels.
166 of the 166 domain citations in answers naming Conga Price Optimization & Management came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Conga Price Optimization & Management's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Conga Price Optimization & Management, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Conga Price Optimization & Management by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: