AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › Competera · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Competera

57Judge labels
0First choices
12Negative labels
13 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Pricing optimization for mid-market buyers
Rank 12 of 76 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 16% of its 25 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Competera →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In pricing optimization · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Competera for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Pricing optimizationRevenue operations0%12 of 7616%25accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Competera yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Competera across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.502002
GPT-5.4 mini01001
Gemini 3.5 Flash00112
Perplexity Sonar00101
Grok 4.1 Fast11013
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash01102
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash02114
Kimi K201214
GLM 4.7 FlashX02002
MiniMax M2.501102
GPT-6 Luna00101
Muse Glimmer 30B01001

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct6 labelsNone
Paraphrase2 labelsNone
Comparative25 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained9 labelsNone
Scale-constrained4 labelsNone
Negative11 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative57 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“retail picks Competera” Grok 4.1 Fast · Pricing optimization · comparative prompt · first choice
“Competera has a starting price of $19.00 per month, making it another very affordable option for basic pricing needs.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Pricing optimization · budget prompt · alternative
“Competera and Omnia Retail bring AI-driven dynamic pricing to mid-market and omnichannel retailers” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Pricing optimization · comparative prompt · alternative
“Choose Competera if you're a large retailer needing AI-native, elasticity-based price optimization” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Pricing optimization · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“What to Avoid - Enterprise platforms like Competera (typically $5,000+/month) are powerful but far beyond limited budgets.” Kimi K2 · Pricing optimization · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid retail-first dynamic pricing tools: ... (like *Prisync*, *Omnia*, or *Competera*) are designed for B2C e-commerce.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Pricing optimization · direct prompt · hard negative
“Avoid enterprise tools like Vendavo, Competera, or PROS” Grok 4.1 Fast · Pricing optimization · budget prompt · hard negative
“enterprise tools (Cost: $5k–$50k+/month like Competera or Vendavo) excel” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Pricing optimization · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Competera, over the 57 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Competera was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Pricefx45 of 5713Not among the top eight
PROS Smart Price Optimization & Management41 of 577Not among the top eight
Vendavo38 of 576Not among the top eight
Zilliant37 of 573Not among the top eight
Prisync29 of 5711Not among the top eight
Price2Spy15 of 575Not among the top eight
Intelligence Node11 of 570Not among the top eight
Revionics10 of 570Not among the top eight
BlackCurve9 of 570Not among the top eight
Quicklizard9 of 570Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Competera. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 56 of the 57 answers that named Competera and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

guideflow.com40
articsledge.com24
gitnux.org24
worldmetrics.org24
dupple.com23
withorb.com19
g2.com18
theretailexec.com17
marketintelligencetools.com16
devopsschool.com15

220 of the 220 domain citations in answers naming Competera came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

competera.ai is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Competera takes 0% of first choices and Pricefx takes 53%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “best pricing optimization platform”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
210 a month (“competera”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
1 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 25,366 a month
Searches its site ranks for
3,000 · 185 in the top three
Sites linking to it
1,733
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
4 ads · 3 text, 1 video · 0 shown in the last 30 days

First shown April 2024, as COMPETERA US LLC, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 1 in the year, 3 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 12 of 76 in pricing optimization
Segment leader
53%
Pricefx
First choices
0 across its categories
Named in
57 answers
Its own site cited
in 56 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on competera.ai
506
subdomains included
Content
442
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
32 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Blog14662026-08-28Pricing optimization
Case study14102025-05-16
News or press6042026-09-30Pricing optimization
Glossary or explainer5012026-07-24Pricing optimization
Podcast or video3502026-05-28
Report or ebook502025-12-03
Comparison402025-07-01
Webinar or virtual event102025-07-05Pricing optimization
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page competera.ai exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Names read as Competera

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Competera; a claim can dispute any of them.
COMPETERA 1

Follow Competera

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Competera's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Competera, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Competera by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Competera is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Competera, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at competera.ai is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.