AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › Zilliant · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Zilliant

106Judge labels
4First choices
24Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
5% in Pricing optimization for mid-market buyers
Rank 4 of 76 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 7% of its 42 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Zilliant →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In pricing optimization · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Zilliant for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Pricing optimizationRevenue operations5%4 of 767%42accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Zilliant yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Zilliant across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.503003
GPT-5.4 mini02002
Gemini 3.5 Flash02114
Perplexity Sonar02204
Grok 4.2004105
Mistral Small01001
DeepSeek V4 Flash02103
Llama 4 Maverick00101
Qwen 3.7 Flash12003
Kimi K202204
GLM 4.7 FlashX02013
MiniMax M2.512003
GPT-6 Luna01102
Muse Glimmer 30B12014

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct28 labels1
Paraphrase31 labels2
Comparative24 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained7 labels1
Scale-constrained5 labelsNone
Negative11 labels2not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative106 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 7 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Zilliant is widely considered the market leader for mid-market to enterprise B2B organizations.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Pricing optimization · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Zilliant - Strong B2B focus with Price IQ for segment and customer-specific recommendations” MiniMax M2.5 · Pricing optimization · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“choose PROS or Zilliant for AI-driven, governed B2B pricing at scale” Muse Glimmer 30B · Pricing optimization · comparative prompt · first choice
“Often highlighted as particularly strong for B2B contexts, with their Price IQ platform generating segment and customer-specific price recommendations” MiniMax M2.5 · Pricing optimization · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Standalone tools such as Zilliant, Vendavo, Pricefx, PROS are typically $100K-$500K+ annually. They earn their keep at enterprise scale and with a dedicated pricing team, not before.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Pricing optimization · scale prompt · soft negative
“Enterprise-Grade Solutions (For Complex, High-Volume Operations) ... Mid-market fit: Good for companies with dedicated pricing teams” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Pricing optimization · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“Enterprise-grade pricing platforms (like Pricefx, Vendavo, or Zilliant) often start at $100,000+ per year.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Pricing optimization · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Zilliant, over the 106 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Zilliant was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Vendavo86 of 1069Not among the top eight
PROS Smart Price Optimization & Management75 of 1069Not among the top eight
Competera37 of 1061Not among the top eight
Conga Price Optimization & Management22 of 1062Not among the top eight
Quicklizard11 of 1060Not among the top eight
BlackCurve10 of 1060Not among the top eight
Intelligence Node10 of 1060Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Zilliant. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 105 of the 106 answers that named Zilliant and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

guideflow.com81
withorb.com50
worldmetrics.org47
g2.com46
gitnux.org43
virtocommerce.com38
articsledge.com36
dupple.com35
learn.g2.com33
gartner.com31

440 of the 440 domain citations in answers naming Zilliant came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

zilliant.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Zilliant takes 5% of first choices and Pricefx takes 53%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “best pricing optimization platform”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
880 a month (“zilliant”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
30 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 3,164 a month
Searches its site ranks for
365 · 57 in the top three
Sites linking to it
1,428
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
7 ads · 7 text · 0 shown in the last 30 days

First shown October 2021, as Zilliant, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 1 in the year, 6 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
5%
rank 4 of 76 in pricing optimization
Segment leader
53%
Pricefx
First choices
4 across its categories
Named in
106 answers
Its own site cited
in 105 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on zilliant.com
951
subdomains included
Content
884
counted in the table below
Documentation
7
Product · Integration
10 · 5
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog31802026-06-04CPQ, Ecommerce marketing
News or press21332026-09-09CPQ
Podcast or video12902025-04-04CPQ
Webinar or virtual event9102026-06-25CPQ
Report or ebook8122026-07-16CPQ
Case study3542026-09-24CPQ
Glossary or explainer1202024-11-26
Conference or event402023-02-14
Comparison1undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page zilliant.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name CPQ (27); 0 name the category the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Zilliant

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Zilliant; a claim can dispute any of them.
Zilliant (including Price IQ) 1

Follow Zilliant

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Zilliant's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Zilliant, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Zilliant by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Zilliant is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Zilliant, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at zilliant.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.