Every category where a model named Prospero for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Proposal software	Revenue operations	4%	5 of 79	0%	5	under 10 labels · led by PandaDoc at 49%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Prospero yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Prospero across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	1
Kimi K2	1	0	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative9 labelsNone

Budget-constrained8 labels4

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative9 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative26 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Prospero – Most Affordable Overall ... If you need the absolute lowest cost with essential features → Prospero or Proposally.ai” Kimi K2 · Proposals · budget prompt · first choice

“Prospero is widely considered the best pure budget choice for small businesses and freelancers.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Proposals · budget prompt · first choice

“Best for Solo Freelancers: Prospero ... Starts at ~$10/month for solo freelancers.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Proposals · budget prompt · alternative

“Prospero: Best for solo sellers who want sleek templates at a low price.” Llama 4 Maverick · Proposals · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Prospero, over the 26 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Prospero was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Better Proposals23 of 265Not in the top three

PandaDoc21 of 266Not in the top three

Proposify19 of 260Not in the top three

Qwilr16 of 260Not in the top three

Bonsai12 of 262Not in the top three

Loopio9 of 264Not in the top three

Proposable9 of 260Not in the top three

Responsive8 of 263Not in the top three

DealHub8 of 260Not in the top three

Nusii7 of 261Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Prospero. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 26 answers that named Prospero and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

flowcase.com3

getaccept.com3

autogenai.com2

dochipo.com2

federicopresicci.com2

lindy.ai2

pandadoc.com2

qwilr.com2

reddit.com2

storydoc.com2

Twenty-two of the twenty-two domain citations in answers naming Prospero came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

getaccept.com/blog/proposal-software3

autogenai.com/blog/best-proposal-management-software2

dochipo.com/proposal-software-for-small-businesses2

federicopresicci.com/blog/sales-enablement-technology/best-proposal-software2

flowcase.com/blog/top-10-proposal-management-software-for-small-businesses-20262

lindy.ai/blog/proposal-software2

qwilr.com/blog/best-proposal-software2

reddit.com/r/msp/comments/1ff0hjn/any_thoughts_or_experience_with_proposal_softwares2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Prospero's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Prospero, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at prospero.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.