Small business=heldSince September 2026: 4% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
4%from 4% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 6 → 4 of 52
2 categories · RankedProspero
31Judge labels
5First choices
1Negative labels
12 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
6% in Proposals for mid-market buyers
Rank 4 of 56 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 14 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Prospero →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business4 of 53
4%11 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market4 of 56
6%14 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise57 of 67
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
In proposals · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Prospero for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proposal software | Revenue operations | 6% | 4 of 56 | 0% | 14 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 4% → 5%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| RFP response software | Sales | 0% | 56 of 82 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Loopio at 25% |
Movement
Since September 2026, Prospero held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Proposals · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 4% → 5%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
5%from 4% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 5 → 4 of 55
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 68 → 52 of 62
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proposals | 4% | 5% | =heldSince September 2026: 4% → 5%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 5 → 4 of 56 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Prospero across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Prospero across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase2 labelsNone
Comparative7 labelsNone
Budget-constrained18 labels5
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative3 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative31 labels in all, every segment counted; 5 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Prospero at ~$12/mo annual and Better Proposals at $13/mo annual are the most commonly cited best value paid options.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Proposals · budget prompt · first choice
“If you want a dedicated proposal tool with almost no limitations on a tight budget, Prospero is highly recommended.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Proposals · budget prompt · first choice
“For a budget under $300/month, Better Proposals or Prospero are recommended options” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Proposals · budget prompt · first choice
“Best for Clean, Professional Proposals: Prospero ... Highly rated (4.8/5) for ease of use.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Proposals · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Prospero, over the 31 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Prospero was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Prospero, over the 31 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Prospero was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Prospero. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 30 of the 31 answers that named Prospero and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
agiled.app15
g2.com14
responsive.io14
zapier.com14
guideflow.com11
pandadoc.com11
qwilr.com11
freshbooks.com10
sifthub.io9
us.fitgap.com8
117 of the 117 domain citations in answers naming Prospero came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
goprospero.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Prospero takes 6% of first choices and PandaDoc takes 65%.ShowHide
Search and answers
goprospero.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Prospero takes 6% of first choices and PandaDoc takes 65%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “proposal software”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best proposal software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 2,400 a month (“prospero”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 1,178 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 908 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 771 · 5 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,786
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
6%
rank 4 of 56 in proposals
Segment leader
65%
PandaDoc
- First choices
- 5 across its categories
- Named in
- 31 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 30 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on goprospero.com
628
subdomains included
Content
69
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
8 · 13
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-11 to 2026-10 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 32 | 15 | 2026-10-03 | Proposals, SEO | |
| Comparison | 31 | 5 | 2026-09-20 | ||
| Case study | 4 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 1 | 0 | 2022-08-12 | ||
| Podcast or video | 1 | 0 | 2022-01-17 |
Most recent
- 2026-10-03Business proposals telecom industry blog
- 2026-09-20Prospero vs canva comparison
- 2026-09-18Increase negotiation tracking proposal blog
- 2026-09-13Post proposal effective ways follow up via email blog
- 2026-09-08How to market your freelance business without spending a dime blog
- 2026-09-05Prospero vs docusign comparison
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page goprospero.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read October 5, 2026.
Follow Prospero
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Prospero is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Prospero is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Business Proposal Software
- For
- businesses
- Price stated
- Start from $12 a month goprospero.com
- Starting price
- 12 goprospero.com
- Free plan or trial
- Free 14-day trial goprospero.com
- Integrations claimed
- 5 goprospero.com
- Customers named
- Mindshare DigitalFulton Creative, LLC.Management & FinanceCO-Founder Management & FinanceIVBS Digital AgencyRedleo Web DesignSafe SchoolKnackBuilders
- Not stated on the pages read
- Certifications, hosting
What Prospero's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: goprospero.com, goprospero.com/pricing, goprospero.com/built-for/security, goprospero.com/features, goprospero.com/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Prospero's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Prospero, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Prospero by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Prospero is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Prospero, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.