Every category where a model named Agiled for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Proposal software	Revenue operations	4%	6 of 79	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by PandaDoc at 49%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Agiled yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Agiled across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	1
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct3 labels2

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative5 labelsNone

Budget-constrained4 labels2

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative15 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Start with Agiled. Because it offers a functional Free plan and the lowest-cost paid tier for a complete system, it minimizes risk.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Proposals · budget prompt · first choice

“or Agiled if you want the lowest-cost all-in-one option” Perplexity Sonar · Proposals · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Agiled, over the 15 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Agiled was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

PandaDoc14 of 156Not in the top three

Better Proposals13 of 153Not in the top three

Proposify12 of 151Not in the top three

Bonsai7 of 150Not in the top three

Qwilr6 of 150Not in the top three

Prospero5 of 150Not in the top three

GetAccept3 of 150Not in the top three

HoneyBook3 of 150Not in the top three

Canva2 of 150Not in the top three

Propal1 of 151Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Agiled. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 15 answers that named Agiled and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

agiled.appYour site4

checkthat.ai4

getaccept.com4

lindy.ai4

pandadoc.com4

qwilr.com4

storydoc.com4

toolradar.com4

zapier.com4

betterproposals.io3

Thirty-five of the thirty-nine domain citations in answers naming Agiled came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

agiled.app/blog/best-proposal-software-for-small-businesses4

checkthat.ai/answers/what-is-the-best-proposal-software4

getaccept.com/blog/proposal-software4

lindy.ai/blog/proposal-software4

pandadoc.com/blog/proposal-software4

qwilr.com/blog/best-proposal-software4

storydoc.com/blog/best-proposal-software4

toolradar.com/guides/best-proposal-software4

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Agiled's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Agiled, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at agiled.app is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.