GTM AI Index

Index › Products › Plutio · October 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Plutio

7Judge labels

1First choices

0Negative labels

6 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

1 label, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Plutio was named 1 time in Client onboarding, where Rocketlane led with 47%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business55 of 101

under the label threshold

Mid-market45 of 104

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In client onboarding · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Plutio for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Client onboarding platforms	Customer	0%	45 of 104	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Rocketlane at 47%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Plutio yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Plutio across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.20	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained3 labels1

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative2 labels2not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative7 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best for Solo Freelancers: Plutio” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Client onboarding · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Plutio, over the 7 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Plutio was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Bonsai5 of 71Not among the top eight

PandaDoc5 of 71Not among the top eight

Better Proposals5 of 70Not among the top eight

Agiled3 of 71Not among the top eight

HoneyBook3 of 71Not among the top eight

Proposify3 of 70Not among the top eight

ClickUp2 of 71Not among the top eight

Jotform2 of 70Not among the top eight

Prospero2 of 70Not among the top eight

Qwilr2 of 70Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Plutio. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 7 of the 7 answers that named Plutio and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

plutio.comYour site7

g2.com4

pandadoc.com4

zapier.com4

agiled.app3

clickup.com3

guideflow.com3

honeybook.com3

responsive.io3

albato.com2

Twenty-nine of the thirty-six domain citations in answers naming Plutio came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

plutio.com/solutions/small-business/proposals5

g2.com/categories/proposal/small-business4

zapier.com/blog/best-proposal-software4

agiled.app/blog/best-proposal-software-for-small-businesses3

guideflow.com/blog/best-proposal-software3

pandadoc.com/blog/proposal-software3

responsive.io/blog/best-proposal-software-comparison3

capterra.com/p/133332/Proposify/reviews2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on plutio.com

1,690

subdomains included

Content

576

counted in the table below

Documentation

345

Product · Integration

493 · 54

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest
Blog	228	0	2026-01-16
Template or tool	197	undated
Comparison	142	0	2026-03-09
Glossary or explainer	5	0	2024-01-01
Report or ebook	3	0	2026-02-23
Case study	1	0	2021-06-16

Most recent

2026-03-09Scoro vs harvest comparison
2026-02-23Facebook lead ads report or ebook
2026-01-16And co to plutio stories blog
2026-01-15And co alternatives comparison
2026-01-14Export and co data blog
2026-01-13And co shutting down migration guide blog

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page plutio.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Plutio

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Plutio's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Plutio, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Plutio by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Plutio is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Plutio, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.