| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Client onboarding platforms | Customer | 4% | 6 of 104 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Rocketlane at 47% | |
| Proposal software | Revenue operations | 2% | 6 of 56 | 0% | 7 | under 10 labels · led by PandaDoc at 65% | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“For most companies with limited budgets, Bonsai (starting around $9–$25/month) offers the best balance of features, polish, and value.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Proposals · budget prompt · first choice
“Bonsai at $9/user/month is the lowest recurring price mentioned for full onboarding workflows with contracts and proposals.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Client onboarding · budget prompt · first choice
“the best fit from the options in your results is Bonsai if you need a simple client onboarding workflow” Perplexity Sonar · Client onboarding · budget prompt · first choice
“Bonsai starts at $9 per user per month and suits freelancers or small agencies who want quick, simple onboarding without complexity” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Client onboarding · budget prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 38 of the 38 answers that named Bonsai and are not a share of its labels.
No domain is on file for Bonsai, so its own site is not marked.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Bonsai's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Bonsai, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Bonsai by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: