AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › Bonsai · October 2026 Edition
2 categories · Ranked

Bonsai

38Judge labels
6First choices
3Negative labels
12 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Proposals for small business buyers
Rank 6 of 104 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 3 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In client onboarding · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Bonsai for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Client onboarding platformsCustomer4%6 of 1040%3under 10 labels · led by Rocketlane at 47%
Proposal softwareRevenue operations2%6 of 560%7under 10 labels · led by PandaDoc at 65%=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Bonsai yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Bonsai across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501001
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar10001
Grok 4.2001001
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash11002
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash02002
Kimi K201001
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B10102

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative9 labels2not counted in share
Budget-constrained16 labels6
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative8 labels2not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative38 labels in all, every segment counted; 6 of the 10 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“For most companies with limited budgets, Bonsai (starting around $9–$25/month) offers the best balance of features, polish, and value.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Proposals · budget prompt · first choice
“Bonsai at $9/user/month is the lowest recurring price mentioned for full onboarding workflows with contracts and proposals.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Client onboarding · budget prompt · first choice
“the best fit from the options in your results is Bonsai if you need a simple client onboarding workflow” Perplexity Sonar · Client onboarding · budget prompt · first choice
“Bonsai starts at $9 per user per month and suits freelancers or small agencies who want quick, simple onboarding without complexity” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Client onboarding · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Bonsai, over the 38 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Bonsai was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
PandaDoc23 of 389Not among the top eight
Better Proposals23 of 381Not among the top eight
Proposify17 of 380Not among the top eight
Prospero13 of 381Not among the top eight
Qwilr11 of 380Not among the top eight
Agiled10 of 383Not among the top eight
HoneyBook9 of 381Not among the top eight
Loopio8 of 380Not among the top eight
Jotform6 of 381Not among the top eight
Rocketlane6 of 381Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Bonsai. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 38 of the 38 answers that named Bonsai and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com20
zapier.com19
agiled.app16
guideflow.com15
pandadoc.com15
qwilr.com15
freshbooks.com13
responsive.io11
thedigitalprojectmanager.com11
assembly.com9

No domain is on file for Bonsai, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where Bonsai stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Searches for its name, Google
74,000 a month (“bonsai”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
27,918 a month
Its own site
No site of its own on file, so no site figures

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
4%
rank 6 of 104 in client onboarding
Segment leader
47%
Rocketlane
First choices
6 across its categories
Named in
38 answers
Its own site cited
No site on file to match

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Follow Bonsai

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Bonsai's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Bonsai, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Bonsai by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Bonsai is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Bonsai, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at the vendor's own domain is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.