Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 36 → 14 of 52
1 category · Named, not rankedDocHipo
6Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
5 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. DocHipo was named 2 times in Proposals, where PandaDoc led with 65%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business14 of 53
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market16 of 56
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In proposals · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named DocHipo for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proposal software | Revenue operations | 0% | 16 of 56 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by PandaDoc at 65% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, DocHipo held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Proposals · by segment
Mid-market▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 12 → 19 of 55
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proposals | 2% | 0% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 12 → 16 of 56 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated DocHipo across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated DocHipo across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained5 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative6 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“one of the most affordable proposal software for small businesses” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Proposals · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as DocHipo, over the 6 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and DocHipo was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as DocHipo, over the 6 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and DocHipo was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named DocHipo. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 6 of the 6 answers that named DocHipo and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
dochipo.comYour site6
agiled.app5
freshbooks.com5
responsive.io5
zapier.com5
mailmodo.com4
pandadoc.com4
qwilr.com4
g2.com3
us.fitgap.com3
Thirty-eight of the forty-four domain citations in answers naming DocHipo came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on dochipo.com
1,383
subdomains included
Content
872
counted in the table below
Documentation
26
Product · Integration
5 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Template or tool | 523 | undated | CRM, SEO | ||
| Blog | 199 | 8 | 2026-09-22 | Proposals | |
| Report or ebook | 57 | 0 | 2025-10-13 | ||
| Comparison | 49 | 5 | 2026-09-18 | ||
| Case study | 19 | 4 | 2026-09-21 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 9 | 0 | 2026-04-06 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 9 | 0 | 2024-05-30 | ||
| Conference or event | 4 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 3 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-22How to write marketing proposal blog
- 2026-09-21How to write marketing case study case study
- 2026-09-18Proposal software for accountants blog
- 2026-09-18Invideo vs flexclip vs dochipo comparison
- 2026-09-11Promo alternatives comparison
- 2026-09-03Accounting services proposal template styles blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page dochipo.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow DocHipo
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
DocHipo is its own company.ShowHide
The company
DocHipo is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Design stunning documents, videos, social posts, and marketing assets in minutes.
- For
- business users and non-designers
- Price stated
- free graphic design software dochipo.com
- Starting price
- 0 dochipo.com/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- It's free. No credit card required. dochipo.com
- Integrations claimed
- 4 dochipo.com · 6 dochipo.com/pricing pages disagree
- Customers named
- Terisha G
- Not stated on the pages read
- Certifications, hosting
What DocHipo's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: dochipo.com, dochipo.com/pricing, dochipo.com/features, dochipo.com/features/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when DocHipo's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as DocHipo, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for DocHipo by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where DocHipo is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name DocHipo, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.