| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract lifecycle management and e-signature | Revenue operations | 2% | 7 of 63 | 7% | 15 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Digital sales rooms | Sales | 0% | 24 of 73 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Dock at 29% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Client onboarding platforms | Customer | 0% | 86 of 104 | 50% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Rocketlane at 47% |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLM | 2% | 2% | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 11 → 7 of 63 |
| Sales rooms | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 24 of 73, unchanged |
| Client onboarding | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 86 of 104, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 5 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“my default recommendation would be DocuSign” GPT-5.4 mini · CLM · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Choose this if you have a dedicated Legal or Compliance team and require strict governance... Note: This can get significantly more expensive than PandaDoc.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · CLM · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“PandaDoc / DocuSign (if you already have them, their "rooms" features may be sufficient” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Sales rooms · negative prompt · alternative
“Best for Compliance-Heavy Industries ... Watch out: Can get expensive at mid-market scale” DeepSeek V4 Flash · CLM · paraphrase prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“it tends to be less budget-friendly as you move into more CLM-focused features” GPT-5.4 mini · CLM · budget prompt · soft negative
“Docusign is a point solution that only handles signatures.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Client onboarding · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 53 of the 63 answers that named DocuSign and are not a share of its labels.
168 of the 168 domain citations in answers naming DocuSign came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 2,376 | 3 | 2026-09-14 | ||
| News or press | 276 | undated | |||
| Case study | 218 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 135 | 5 | 2026-09-17 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 122 | 4 | 2026-09-22 | ||
| Template or tool | 69 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 50 | 1 | 2026-07-24 | ||
| Report or ebook | 49 | 8 | 2026-09-17 | ||
| Podcast or video | 33 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 28 | 1 | 2026-09-14 |
Every page docusign.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · Crunchbase
What DocuSign's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: docusign.com, trust.docusign.com, docusign.com/products/mcp, docusign.com/customer-stories, docusign.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when DocuSign's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as DocuSign, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for DocuSign by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: