Every category where a model named Icertis Contract Intelligence for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Contract lifecycle management and e-signature	Revenue operations	0%	41 of 63	42%	24	criticized challenger	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, Icertis Contract Intelligence held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · CLM · by segment

Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

0%from 0% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 60 → 53 of 53

Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

0%from 0% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 61 → 59 of 60

Enterprise▲+12Since September 2026: 10% → 22%, +12 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.

22%from 10% in September 2026

Cleared the floor by 1 pointRank 4 → 1 of 65

All categories · Mid-market

Category	September 2026	Now	Change	Reading	Rank
CLM	0%	0%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.	Within noise	Rank 61 → 41 of 63

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Icertis Contract Intelligence across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	1	1	2
GPT-5.4 mini	1	0	1	1	3
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	0	3	4
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	1	1
Grok 4.20	0	1	0	0	1
Mistral Small	0	1	1	0	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	1	1	3
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	1	1
Kimi K2	0	1	0	2	3
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	1	0	1
GPT-6 Luna	0	1	0	0	1
Muse Glimmer 30B	1	0	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct19 labels8

Paraphrase8 labels2

Comparative23 labels12not counted in share

Budget-constrained12 labels1

Scale-constrained11 labels1

Negative26 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative99 labels in all, every segment counted; 12 of the 24 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Most enterprise buyers shortlist Icertis (for AI/governance), Ironclad (for workflow UX), and Sirion (for post-signature analytics)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · CLM · comparative prompt · first choice

“Named a Leader in The Forrester Wave: Contract Lifecycle Management Platforms, Q1 2025 with the top score in the Strategy category” Muse Glimmer 30B · CLM · comparative prompt · first choice

“Icertis = deepest enterprise contract intelligence” GPT-5.4 mini · CLM · comparative prompt · first choice

“Enterprise-grade scalability, procurement/compliance focus. Suited for large enterprises” Grok 4.20 · CLM · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Implementation is lengthy and demanding... dramatically overkill for organizations under 500 employees.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · CLM · negative prompt · hard negative

“Avoid vendors like Ironclad, Agiloft, Icertis, and ContractPodAI if budget predictability matters” Kimi K2 · CLM · budget prompt · hard negative

“generally avoid buying "Heavy Enterprise" platforms like Icertis or Conga” Qwen 3.7 Flash · CLM · negative prompt · hard negative

“Avoid if you're mid-market or need quick time-to-value.” Kimi K2 · CLM · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Icertis Contract Intelligence, over the 99 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Icertis Contract Intelligence was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Ironclad84 of 9913Not among the top eight

DocuSign CLM73 of 993Not among the top eight

Agiloft67 of 995Not among the top eight

Conga CLM52 of 990Not among the top eight

Sirion47 of 993Not among the top eight

Juro27 of 997Not among the top eight

LinkSquares27 of 990Not among the top eight

ContractSafe26 of 997Not among the top eight

Concord21 of 996Not among the top eight

PandaDoc20 of 995Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Icertis Contract Intelligence. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 94 of the 99 answers that named Icertis Contract Intelligence and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

bindlegal.com50

conga.com49

sirion.ai44

oneflow.com35

ironcladapp.com34

g2.com33

zylo.com32

larksuite.com28

juro.com26

contractsafe.com24

355 of the 355 domain citations in answers naming Icertis Contract Intelligence came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

conga.com/resources/blog/contract-management-tools44

zylo.com/blog/best-contract-management-software32

oneflow.com/blog/contract-lifecycle-management-software31

larksuite.com/en_us/blog/contract-lifecycle-management-software27

quickbase.com/blog/best-contract-lifecycle-management-software24

ironcladapp.com/journal/contract-management/best-contract-management-tools21

learn.g2.com/best-clm-software21

juro.com/learn/clm-contract-lifecycle-management-software20

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

icertis.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Icertis Contract Intelligence takes 0% of first choices and PandaDoc takes 23%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “contract lifecycle management platform”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “best contract lifecycle management platform”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 140 a month (“icertis contract intelligence”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 2 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 173,589 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 6,089 · 1,027 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 3,356
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

120+ ads · 74 image, 46 text · 29 shown in the last 30 days

First shown January 2025, as Icertis Inc., verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 90 in the year, 30 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 41 of 63 in CLM

Segment leader

23%

PandaDoc

First choices: 12 across its categories
Named in: 99 answers
Its own site cited: in 94 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on icertis.com

1,275

subdomains included

Content

917

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

66 · 31

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest
Report or ebook	438	14	2026-09-27
News or press	323	2	2026-08-11
Case study	58	4	2026-08-19
Glossary or explainer	46	2	2026-07-20
Webinar or virtual event	37	0	2026-05-05
Conference or event	10	9	2026-11-17
Comparison	4	0	2025-09-08
Blog	1	1	2026-09-14

Most recent

2026-11-17Microsoft ignite 2026 conference or event
2026-10-22Msft ai tour cologne conference or event
2026-10-14Sap public sector summit conference or event
2026-10-12Microsoft ai tour singapore conference or event
2026-10-12Ausa annual meeting and exposition conference or event
2026-10-06Sap for utilities presented by asug conference or event

Events in person

Upcoming

November 17, 2026 to November 20, 2026Microsoft IgniteMoscone Center, San Francisco, United States · exhibits

Last twelve months

October 5, 2026 to October 7, 2026SAP Connect 2026Las Vegas Convention Center, Las Vegas · sponsored

As the event pages on icertis.com state them, read September 28, 2026.

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page icertis.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Icertis Contract Intelligence

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Icertis Contract Intelligence; a claim can dispute any of them.

Icertis 24

Follow Icertis Contract Intelligence

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Icertis is the company behind Icertis Contract Intelligence.

ShowHide

On record

Wikidata

Website: icertis.com
Headquarters: Bellevue, United States
Founded: 2009

Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · Crunchbase

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: AI-native contract intelligence
icertis.com
For: Global Enterprises
icertis.com/customers
Certifications: FedRAMP-readyMGI ResearchLeader in The Forrester Wave™Certified by MGI Research
Customers named: HPEnbridgeShermcoMercedes BenzMicrosoftAccentureWilson SonsiniFennemore
Not stated on the pages read: Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting

What Icertis Contract Intelligence's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: icertis.com, icertis.com/solutions, icertis.com/customers, icertis.com/products/platform/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Icertis Contract Intelligence's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Icertis Contract Intelligence, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Icertis Contract Intelligence by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Icertis Contract Intelligence is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Icertis Contract Intelligence, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.