Small business▼−12Since September 2026: 18% → 6%, −12 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.
6%from 18% in September 2026
Cleared the floor by 1 pointRank 2 → 3 of 53
1 category · RankedContractSafe
63Judge labels
6First choices
6Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
5% in CLM for enterprise buyers
Rank 16 of 63 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 7% of its 14 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of ContractSafe →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business4 of 53
5%37 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market16 of 63
0%14 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise6 of 65
5%12 labels
criticized challenger
In clm · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named ContractSafe for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract lifecycle management and e-signature | Revenue operations | 0% | 16 of 63 | 7% | 14 | accepted challenger | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, ContractSafe held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · CLM · by segment
Mid-market▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 10 → 15 of 60
Enterprise▼−4Since September 2026: 10% → 6%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
6%from 10% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 7 pointsRank 6 of 65, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLM | 2% | 0% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 10 → 16 of 63 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated ContractSafe across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated ContractSafe across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct7 labels1
Paraphrase3 labelsNone
Comparative10 labels2not counted in share
Budget-constrained25 labels4
Scale-constrained6 labels1
Negative12 labels3not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative63 labels in all, every segment counted; 6 of the 11 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“If you have 10+ people who need access: ContractSafe ... becomes more cost-effective than per-seat alternatives.” Kimi K2 · CLM · budget prompt · alternative
“Flat pricing ($450/mo unlimited users), fast OCR search | Lighter on workflow automation” Kimi K2 · CLM · scale prompt · alternative
“Best for teams that need a searchable repository with reminders and published pricing” Mistral Small · CLM · budget prompt · alternative
“Unlimited users = budget win for teams. AI search/review, fast onboarding.” Grok 4.20 · CLM · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“more repository than true CLM” Perplexity Sonar · CLM · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as ContractSafe, over the 63 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ContractSafe was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as ContractSafe, over the 63 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ContractSafe was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named ContractSafe. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 63 of the 63 answers that named ContractSafe and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
contractsafe.comYour site43
bindlegal.com39
conga.com29
concord.app28
g2.com25
juro.com24
zylo.com24
getaccept.com23
larksuite.com23
pandadoc.com23
238 of the 281 domain citations in answers naming ContractSafe came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
contractsafe.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, ContractSafe takes 0% of first choices and PandaDoc takes 23%.ShowHide
Search and answers
contractsafe.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, ContractSafe takes 0% of first choices and PandaDoc takes 23%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “contract lifecycle management platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best contract lifecycle management platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 1,000 a month (“contractsafe”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 7 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 38,687 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 4,892 · 249 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,903
- Paid Google search
- 2 searches its ads show for, about 20 clicks and $687 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 16 of 63 in CLM
Segment leader
23%
PandaDoc
- First choices
- 6 across its categories
- Named in
- 63 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 63 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on contractsafe.com
795
subdomains included
Content
554
counted in the table below
Documentation
169
Product · Integration
18 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 404 | 31 | 2026-09-23 | CLM | |
| Glossary or explainer | 83 | 0 | 2023-05-19 | ||
| Comparison | 33 | 3 | 2026-09-24 | CLM, CRM | |
| Case study | 14 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 10 | 0 | 2025-08-12 | CLM | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 7 | 0 | 2026-06-12 | ||
| Conference or event | 2 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-24Agentic ai vs clm comparison
- 2026-09-23Healthcare contract lifecycle management blog
- 2026-09-23Contract management maturity assessment blog
- 2026-09-16Contract management software adoption blog
- 2026-09-09Contract collaboration software blog
- 2026-09-08Accidental contract manager blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page contractsafe.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow ContractSafe
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
ContractSafe.ShowHide
The company
ContractSafe.
ShowHideOn record
Wikidata- Website
- contractsafe.com
Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- ContractSafe is the easiest-to-use, affordable, ai-powered contract lifecycle management solution with unlimited users and top-rated support
- For
- companies of all sizes
- Price stated
- Starting at $450/mo contractsafe.com
- Starting price
- 450 contractsafe.com
- Free plan or trial
- Request a Free Trial contractsafe.com
- Integrations claimed
- 6 contractsafe.com/pricing
- Certifications
- HIPAA compliantSOC2 audit certificationHIPAA & GDPR compliantISO 27001 certificationPCI DSS certified data centersSOC 2 Type II certified (annual audit)ISO 27001 certifiedGDPR compliant
- Hosting
- United StatesCanadaEuropean UnionAustraliaUKUSEU
- Customers named
- GenerateJourneyAppsCity of OlympiaWorld Oil
What ContractSafe's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: contractsafe.com, contractsafe.com/pricing, contractsafe.com/security, contractsafe.com/features/alerts, contractsafe.com/blog/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ContractSafe's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ContractSafe, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for ContractSafe by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where ContractSafe is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name ContractSafe, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.