Every category where a model named ContractSafe for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Contract lifecycle management and e-signature	Revenue operations	2%	10 of 65	8%	12	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for ContractSafe yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated ContractSafe across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	0	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	3	0	0	3
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	0	0	1
Mistral Small	0	2	0	0	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	1	1	0	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct10 labels4

Paraphrase3 labelsNone

Comparative10 labels5not counted in share

Budget-constrained25 labels7

Scale-constrained6 labels3

Negative11 labels4not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative65 labels in all, every segment counted; 14 of the 23 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Zoho Contracts or ContractSafe are typically the best choices” MiniMax M2.5 · CLM · budget prompt · first choice

“Provides an affordable, easy-to-use contract management software solution offering secure storage, keyword search, and automated alerts” Claude Haiku 4.5 · CLM · budget prompt · alternative

“Best for Storage & Tracking ... Flat pricing regardless of users, excellent search capabilities” Mistral Small · CLM · budget prompt · alternative

“Best for Growth & Cross-Department Use: ContractSafe ... flat-rate pricing and unlimited users” Gemini 3.5 Flash · CLM · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“described as repositories or document tools that do not manage the full lifecycle” Perplexity Sonar · CLM · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as ContractSafe, over the 65 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ContractSafe was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

PandaDoc54 of 6515Not in the top three

Ironclad42 of 652Not in the top three

Concord39 of 655Not in the top three

DocuSign CLM34 of 650Not in the top three

Juro25 of 654Not in the top three

Agiloft23 of 653Not in the top three

ContractWorks23 of 650Not in the top three

Icertis22 of 650Not in the top three

Zoho Contracts18 of 657Not in the top three

GetAccept18 of 651Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named ContractSafe. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 9 of the 65 answers that named ContractSafe and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

bindlegal.com6

g2.com6

ironcladapp.com6

getaccept.com5

learn.g2.com5

sirion.ai5

worksbuddy.ai5

conga.com4

juro.com4

oneflow.com4

Fifty of the fifty domain citations in answers naming ContractSafe came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

bindlegal.com/resources/best-software/best-clm-tools5

g2.com/categories/contract-lifecycle-management-clm/small-business5

getaccept.com/blog/best-contract-management-software5

ironcladapp.com/journal/contract-management/best-contract-management-tools5

sirion.ai/library/clm-platform/contract-management-software5

worksbuddy.ai/blogs/what-are-the-best-contract-management-lifecycle-software-for-small-bus5

conga.com/resources/blog/contract-management-tools4

juro.com/learn/clm-contract-lifecycle-management-software4

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

The company

ContractSafe.

Website: contractsafe.com

From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ContractSafe's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ContractSafe, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at contractsafe.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.