Every category where a model named ContractWorks for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Contract lifecycle management and e-signature	Revenue operations	4%	9 of 65	9%	11	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for ContractWorks yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated ContractWorks across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	0	1	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	1	0	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	0	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	1	1	1	0	3
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	1	0	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative8 labelsNone

Budget-constrained11 labels2

Scale-constrained3 labelsNone

Negative7 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative31 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“The best contract lifecycle management platform for a company with a limited budget is ContractWorks” Llama 4 Maverick · CLM · budget prompt · first choice

“pick ContractWorks for the best balance of affordability and usability” Perplexity Sonar · CLM · budget prompt · first choice

“ContractWorks is a budget-friendly option for simple storage needs” Llama 4 Maverick · CLM · comparative prompt · alternative

“start with lighter options like Juro, ContractWorks, or SpotDraft” DeepSeek V4 Flash · CLM · negative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“described as repositories or document tools that do not manage the full lifecycle” Perplexity Sonar · CLM · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as ContractWorks, over the 31 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ContractWorks was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

ContractSafe23 of 3111Not in the top three

PandaDoc21 of 3110Not in the top three

Ironclad21 of 311Not in the top three

DocuSign CLM19 of 310Not in the top three

Concord15 of 313Not in the top three

Agiloft14 of 312Not in the top three

Juro14 of 310Not in the top three

Icertis13 of 310Not in the top three

Zoho Contracts11 of 314Not in the top three

LinkSquares11 of 310Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named ContractWorks. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 5 of the 31 answers that named ContractWorks and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

bindlegal.com5

getaccept.com5

sirion.ai5

checkbox.ai4

ironcladapp.com4

techfundingnews.com4

worksuite.com4

conga.com3

contractsafe.com3

haqq.ai3

Forty of the forty domain citations in answers naming ContractWorks came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

bindlegal.com/resources/best-software/best-clm-tools5

getaccept.com/blog/best-contract-management-software5

sirion.ai/library/clm-platform/contract-management-software5

ironcladapp.com/journal/contract-management/best-contract-management-tools4

techfundingnews.com/9-best-contract-lifecycle-management-platforms-for-procurement-teams-24

worksuite.com/resources/insights/best-contract-lifecycle-management-tools4

conga.com/resources/blog/contract-management-tools3

haqq.ai/blog/contract-lifecycle-management-software3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ContractWorks's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ContractWorks, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at contra.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.