Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 59 → 50 of 53
1 category · RankedAgiloft
91Judge labels
5First choices
25Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
9% in CLM for enterprise buyers
Rank 17 of 63 in the mid-market standingcriticized challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 28% of its 32 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Agiloft →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business51 of 53
0%15 labels
criticized challenger
Mid-market17 of 63
0%32 labels
criticized challenger
Enterprise4 of 65
9%44 labels
accepted challenger
In clm · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Agiloft for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract lifecycle management and e-signature | Revenue operations | 0% | 17 of 63 | 28% | 32 | criticized challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Agiloft held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · CLM · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 16 → 17 of 60
Enterprise▼−2Since September 2026: 10% → 8%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
8%from 10% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 5 → 4 of 65
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLM | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 16 → 17 of 63 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Agiloft across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Agiloft across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct13 labelsNone
Paraphrase2 labelsNone
Comparative26 labelsNone
Budget-constrained15 labels5
Scale-constrained9 labelsNone
Negative26 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative91 labels in all, every segment counted; 5 of the 6 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Agiloft is frequently cited as the best choice for budget-conscious companies that still need deep customization” Qwen 3.7 Flash · CLM · budget prompt · alternative
“Good options for your size include Ironclad, Conga, Agiloft, DocuSign CLM, SpotDraft, and LinkSquares” DeepSeek V4 Flash · CLM · scale prompt · alternative
“Your processes are unusual or change often, and you need substantial workflow configuration.” GPT-6 Luna · CLM · comparative prompt · alternative
“Best for: Organizations with unique, complex workflows needing maximum configurability” Mistral Small · CLM · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Avoid vendors like Ironclad, Agiloft, Icertis, and ContractPodAI if budget predictability matters” Kimi K2 · CLM · budget prompt · hard negative
“Verdict: Avoid if you lack the internal resources to configure and maintain the system.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · CLM · negative prompt · hard negative
“you also want to avoid heavy, enterprise-grade CLM systems (like Icertis or Agiloft) that cost six figures” Gemini 3.5 Flash · CLM · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“usually out of the question, as they can easily cost tens of thousands of dollars annually” Gemini 3.5 Flash · CLM · budget prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Agiloft, over the 91 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Agiloft was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Agiloft, over the 91 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Agiloft was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Agiloft. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 87 of the 91 answers that named Agiloft and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
bindlegal.com51
conga.com41
sirion.ai39
oneflow.com33
g2.com32
larksuite.com28
zylo.com27
contractsafe.com26
ironcladapp.com26
juro.com25
328 of the 328 domain citations in answers naming Agiloft came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
agiloft.com ranks 2 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Agiloft takes 0% of first choices and PandaDoc takes 23%.ShowHide
Search and answers
agiloft.com ranks 2 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Agiloft takes 0% of first choices and PandaDoc takes 23%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “contract lifecycle management platform”
2
Position for “best contract lifecycle management platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 3,600 a month (“agiloft”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 61 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 12,773 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 1,415 · 76 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 2,344
- Paid Google search
- 3 searches its ads show for, about 312 clicks and $23,523 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 17 of 63 in CLM
Segment leader
23%
PandaDoc
- First choices
- 5 across its categories
- Named in
- 91 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 87 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on agiloft.com
668
subdomains included
Content
477
counted in the table below
Documentation
64
Product · Integration
15 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 241 | 98 | 2026-09-23 | ||
| News or press | 199 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 15 | 15 | 2026-09-23 | ||
| Comparison | 8 | 3 | 2026-09-23 | ||
| Conference or event | 7 | 0 | 2023-02-01 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 4 | 2 | 2026-09-24 | ||
| Podcast or video | 2 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-245bb88a29 614e 4883 a065 d5b8b433c972 webinar or virtual event
- 2026-09-233 ways to unlock contract data to drive new revenue blog
- 2026-09-234 types of contract data and the evolution of data first clm blog
- 2026-09-234 ways procurement will take control of its contracting destiny in 2023 blog
- 2026-09-235 key clauses to include in any vendor agreement blog
- 2026-09-235 lessons for clm implementation blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page agiloft.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Agiloft
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Agiloft.ShowHide
The company
Agiloft.
ShowHideOn record
Wikidata- Website
- agiloft.com
- Headquarters
- Redwood City, United States
- Founded
- 1990
Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- AI Contract Lifecycle Management Software
- For
- legal and procurement teams
- Price stated
- Custom pricing based on organization size and requirements. Three tiers available: Essentials, Advanced, and Premium. agiloft.com
- Free plan or trial
- Free tier available agiloft.com
- Integrations claimed
- 1000 agiloft.com
- Certifications
- SOC 1SOC 2ISO 27001ISO 27701
- Hosting
- inside or outside the USA
- Customers named
- Integra LifeSciencesGoodwillRUSHAlkermes plcCDWNetAppWSP
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price
What Agiloft's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: agiloft.com, agiloft.com/pricing, agiloft.com/terms-policies/security, agiloft.com/platform, agiloft.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Agiloft's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Agiloft, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Agiloft by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Agiloft is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Agiloft, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.