Every category where a model named Agiloft for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Contract lifecycle management and e-signature	Revenue operations	0%	16 of 65	30%	27	criticized challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Agiloft yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Agiloft across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	1	0	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	3	4
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	3	0	4
Mistral Small	0	1	1	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1	3	5
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	2	0	0	2
Kimi K2	1	1	1	3
GLM 4.7 FlashX	2	0	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct14 labelsNone

Paraphrase4 labelsNone

Comparative25 labelsNone

Budget-constrained12 labels4

Scale-constrained10 labelsNone

Negative20 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative85 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Choose Agiloft if: Your business has complex, multi-departmental routing rules that require massive software customization” Gemini 3.5 Flash · CLM · comparative prompt · alternative

“Choose Agiloft if you require on-premise hosting, strict compliance, or heavy custom configuration” Qwen 3.7 Flash · CLM · comparative prompt · alternative

“Agiloft ⭐ Best for Customization ... Requires more configuration effort than others” GLM 4.7 FlashX · CLM · direct prompt · alternative

“Good for companies with complex regulatory requirements (Compliance heavy).” Qwen 3.7 Flash · CLM · scale prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Avoid enterprise CLMs like Ironclad, DocuSign CLM, Agiloft, or ContractPodAi” DeepSeek V4 Flash · CLM · budget prompt · hard negative

“you also want to avoid the massive cost, long setup times, and complexity of heavyweight enterprise ... systems (like Agiloft or Icertis)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · CLM · paraphrase prompt · soft negative

“Avoid enterprise platforms like Icertis or Agiloft if you do not have the budget for a 6-figure implementation” Gemini 3.5 Flash · CLM · negative prompt · soft negative

“Approach Ironclad and Agiloft with caution unless you have dedicated implementation resources.” Mistral Small · CLM · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Agiloft, over the 85 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Agiloft was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Ironclad76 of 8516Not in the top three

DocuSign CLM69 of 853Not in the top three

Icertis66 of 8510Not in the top three

Sirion53 of 859Not in the top three

Conga CLM49 of 850Not in the top three

LinkSquares35 of 850Not in the top three

Juro34 of 859Not in the top three

PandaDoc24 of 857Not in the top three

ContractSafe23 of 858Not in the top three

Concord23 of 855Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Agiloft. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 13 of the 85 answers that named Agiloft and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

gartner.com8

sirion.ai8

summize.com7

aline.co6

conga.com6

bindlegal.com5

ironcladapp.com5

juro.com5

contractsafe.com4

g2.com4

Fifty-eight of the fifty-eight domain citations in answers naming Agiloft came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

summize.com/clm-hub/best-clm-software7

gartner.com/reviews/market/contract-life-cycle-management6

conga.com/resources/blog/contract-management-tools5

juro.com/learn/clm-contract-lifecycle-management-software5

aline.co/post/best-contract-lifecycle-management-software4

contractsafe.com/blog/best-contract-management-software4

ironcladapp.com/journal/contract-management/best-contract-management-tools4

sirion.ai/library/clm-platform/contract-management-software4

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

The company

Agiloft.

Website: agiloft.com
Headquarters: Redwood City, United States
Founded: 1990

From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Agiloft's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Agiloft, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at agiloft.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.