GTM AI Index
Index Vendors › Sirion · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Sirion

61Judge labels
5First choices
16Negative labels
12 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
12% in CLM for enterprise buyers
Rank 17 of 65 in the mid-market standingcriticized challenger
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 30% of its 23 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentStrongest at enterprise.
In clm · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Sirion for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Contract lifecycle management and e-signatureRevenue operations0%17 of 6530%23criticized challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Sirion yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Sirion across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.510001
GPT-5.4 mini00101
Gemini 3.5 Flash10023
Perplexity Sonar00101
Grok 4.1 Fast01113
Mistral Small01203
DeepSeek V4 Flash01034
Llama 4 Maverick00202
Qwen 3.7 Flash10001
Kimi K210001
GLM 4.7 FlashX01012
MiniMax M2.500101

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct13 labels5
Paraphrase2 labelsNone
Comparative24 labels4not counted in share
Budget-constrained4 labelsNone
Scale-constrained6 labelsNone
Negative12 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative61 labels in all, every segment counted; 5 of the 10 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“The AI-First Enterprise Leader... Sirion is a perennial Gartner Magic Quadrant Leader known for having some of the deepest AI capabilities in the industry.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · CLM · comparative prompt · first choice
“An AI-native Contract Lifecycle Management platform purpose-built for enterprises... Recognized as a Magic Quadrant Leader for the fourth consecutive year” Claude Haiku 4.5 · CLM · comparative prompt · first choice
“Deepest post-signature obligation management; AI extracts 1,200+ fields across 100+ languages” Kimi K2 · CLM · comparative prompt · first choice
“Ranked #1 in all Gartner use cases (Pre-sign, Post-sign, Analytics)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · CLM · comparative prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“you do not need—and should actively avoid—heavy enterprise-grade CLM systems (like Icertis or Sirion)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · CLM · scale prompt · hard negative
“Verdict: Approach with caution if you need quick adoption, modern UI, and straightforward integrations.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · CLM · negative prompt · soft negative
“but 6–12 month implementations ... you likely don't need the full enterprise implementations” DeepSeek V4 Flash · CLM · scale prompt · soft negative
“Enterprise-grade CLMs (like Icertis, Sirion, or Agiloft) are often too expensive” Gemini 3.5 Flash · CLM · direct prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Sirion, over the 61 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Sirion was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Ironclad56 of 6113Not in the top three
Icertis54 of 617Not in the top three
Agiloft53 of 613Not in the top three
DocuSign CLM52 of 612Not in the top three
Conga CLM44 of 610Not in the top three
LinkSquares30 of 611Not in the top three
Juro26 of 615Not in the top three
Workday CLM14 of 610Not in the top three
Gatekeeper12 of 611Not in the top three
Malbek12 of 610Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Sirion. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 8 of the 61 answers that named Sirion and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

gartner.com5
ironcladapp.com5
bindlegal.com4
conga.com4
sirion.aiYour site4
docusign.com3
g2.com3
getaccept.com3
icertis.com3
juro.com3

Thirty-three of the thirty-seven domain citations in answers naming Sirion came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Sirion's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Sirion, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at sirion.ai is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.