Small business=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 12 → 9 of 53
1 category · RankedSpotDraft
40Judge labels
2First choices
4Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in CLM for enterprise buyers
Rank 15 of 63 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 6% of its 16 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of SpotDraft →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business9 of 53
2%13 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market15 of 63
0%16 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise13 of 65
2%10 labels
accepted challenger
In clm · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named SpotDraft for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract lifecycle management and e-signature | Revenue operations | 0% | 15 of 63 | 6% | 16 | accepted challenger | ▼−6Since September 2026: 6% → 0%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, SpotDraft held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · CLM · by segment
Mid-market▼−6Since September 2026: 6% → 0%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 6% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 5 pointsRank 6 → 14 of 60
Enterprise▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 60 → 12 of 65
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLM | 6% | 0% | ▼−6Since September 2026: 6% → 0%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 6 → 15 of 63 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated SpotDraft across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated SpotDraft across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct8 labelsNone
Paraphrase2 labelsNone
Comparative9 labelsNone
Budget-constrained7 labels1
Scale-constrained10 labels1
Negative4 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative40 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“look for cloud-native platforms like Ironclad, SpotDraft, or Juro” Qwen 3.7 Flash · CLM · negative prompt · first choice
“Good options for your size include Ironclad, Conga, Agiloft, DocuSign CLM, SpotDraft, and LinkSquares” DeepSeek V4 Flash · CLM · scale prompt · alternative
“Good for lean legal teams, Asia-Pacific presence | Growing platform; check enterprise references” Kimi K2 · CLM · scale prompt · alternative
“Excellent, modern, highly intuitive platforms designed for fast-growing companies.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · CLM · scale prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“limited integration and automation options... users report consistent product issues” Claude Haiku 4.5 · CLM · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as SpotDraft, over the 40 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SpotDraft was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as SpotDraft, over the 40 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SpotDraft was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SpotDraft. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 38 of the 40 answers that named SpotDraft and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
bindlegal.com21
conga.com21
spotdraft.comYour site19
contractsafe.com17
ironcladapp.com15
zylo.com15
learn.g2.com14
concord.app13
g2.com13
oneflow.com13
142 of the 161 domain citations in answers naming SpotDraft came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
spotdraft.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, SpotDraft takes 0% of first choices and PandaDoc takes 23%.ShowHide
Search and answers
spotdraft.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, SpotDraft takes 0% of first choices and PandaDoc takes 23%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “contract lifecycle management platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best contract lifecycle management platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 1,300 a month (“spotdraft”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 17 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 5,760 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 3,544 · 10 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,855
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 15 of 63 in CLM
Segment leader
23%
PandaDoc
- First choices
- 2 across its categories
- Named in
- 40 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 38 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on spotdraft.com
1,655
subdomains included
Content
1,066
counted in the table below
Documentation
425
Product · Integration
18 · 20
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 675 | 154 | 2026-09-29 | CLM, CRM | |
| Podcast or video | 134 | 81 | 2026-09-28 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 91 | 16 | 2026-09-23 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 65 | 5 | 2026-09-23 | CLM | |
| Comparison | 35 | 22 | 2026-09-25 | CLM | |
| Case study | 28 | 21 | 2026-09-10 | ||
| Template or tool | 17 | 12 | 2026-09-09 | CLM | |
| Report or ebook | 14 | 1 | 2026-07-28 | CLM | |
| Conference or event | 6 | 1 | 2026-07-28 | ||
| News or press | 1 | 0 | 2025-02-12 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-29Basics of contract management software blog
- 2026-09-29Contract collaboration software blog
- 2026-09-29Contract tracking tips blog
- 2026-09-29Cost effective clm blog
- 2026-09-28A guide to healthcare contracts and management blog
- 2026-09-28Turn contracts into business insights blog
Events in person
Last twelve months
- May 11, 2026 to May 14, 2026CLOC Global Institute 2026McCormick Place West, Chicago · sponsored
As the event pages on spotdraft.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page spotdraft.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow SpotDraft
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
SpotDraft is its own company.ShowHide
The company
SpotDraft is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- AI-native contract lifecycle management built for control. Draft, review, sign & renew faster, with legal in charge. Go live in weeks with SpotDraft.
- For
- high-performing in-house legal teams
- Price stated
- Flexible pricing based on users or contract volume. In-house implementation, workflow setup, integrations, and 24/7 support at no extra cost. spotdraft.com/pricing
- Integrations claimed
- 30 spotdraft.com/pricing
- Certifications
- ISO 27001SOC 2 Type IIGDPRHIPAAESIGNEIDASISO/IEC 27001:2022ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Certified Company
- Hosting
- EU (Netherlands)USEUIndiaMiddle East
- Customers named
- Abnormal SecurityIPSYGuidelineChaberton EnergyBeameryCirculariseGameskraftSUN Mobility
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, free plan or trial
What SpotDraft's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: spotdraft.com, spotdraft.com/pricing, spotdraft.com/security, spotdraft.com/products/editor, spotdraft.com/customer-stories. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SpotDraft's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SpotDraft, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for SpotDraft by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where SpotDraft is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name SpotDraft, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.