Every category where a model named SpotDraft for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Contract lifecycle management and e-signature	Revenue operations	6%	6 of 65	11%	19	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for SpotDraft yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated SpotDraft across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	1	0	0	2
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	2	0	0	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	2	1	1	4
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	2	1	0	4
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	2	0	3
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	1	1	0	1	3
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct9 labels2

Paraphrase2 labelsNone

Comparative6 labelsNone

Budget-constrained4 labels1

Scale-constrained3 labels1

Negative8 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative32 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“For startups with very limited budgets, SpotDraft's free tier and affordable paid options may be worth evaluating first.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · CLM · budget prompt · first choice

“Expected value usually comes fastest from Ironclad, Juro, SpotDraft, or DocuSign CLM” DeepSeek V4 Flash · CLM · scale prompt · first choice

“SpotDraft offers the best value (lowest median price, legal-team focus)” Kimi K2 · CLM · direct prompt · first choice

“SpotDraft is an AI-powered CLM platform that helps organizations automate contract creation, review, approvals and management” Claude Haiku 4.5 · CLM · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Bugs/UI glitches, missing features ... avoid if reliability or advanced editing is key.” Grok 4.1 Fast · CLM · negative prompt · soft negative

“typically starts around $15,000–$30,000/year (Juro, SpotDraft, Ironclad)” Kimi K2 · CLM · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as SpotDraft, over the 32 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SpotDraft was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Juro26 of 325Not in the top three

Ironclad26 of 324Not in the top three

DocuSign CLM19 of 320Not in the top three

PandaDoc17 of 327Not in the top three

LinkSquares17 of 321Not in the top three

Icertis15 of 321Not in the top three

Agiloft15 of 320Not in the top three

Concord14 of 322Not in the top three

Conga CLM12 of 320Not in the top three

ContractSafe11 of 322Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SpotDraft. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 6 of the 32 answers that named SpotDraft and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com4

contractsafe.com3

gartner.com3

learn.g2.com3

albato.com2

bindlegal.com2

conga.com2

guideflow.com2

hyperstart.com2

ironcladapp.com2

Twenty-five of the twenty-five domain citations in answers naming SpotDraft came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

contractsafe.com/blog/best-contract-management-software3

albato.com/blog/publications/best-contract-management-software2

bindlegal.com/resources/best-software/best-clm-tools2

conga.com/resources/blog/contract-management-tools2

g2.com/categories/contract-lifecycle-management-clm2

g2.com/categories/contract-lifecycle-management-clm/small-business2

gartner.com/reviews/market/contract-life-cycle-management2

guideflow.com/blog/best-contract-lifecycle-management-software2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as SpotDraft

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as SpotDraft; a claim can dispute any of them.

SpotDraft / Bind 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SpotDraft's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SpotDraft, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at spotdraft.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.