Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 54 → 20 of 53
1 category · RankedLinkSquares
42Judge labels
0First choices
4Negative labels
13 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in CLM for mid-market buyers
Rank 14 of 63 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 25 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of LinkSquares →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business20 of 53
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market14 of 63
0%25 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise21 of 65
0%14 labels
criticized challenger
In clm · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named LinkSquares for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract lifecycle management and e-signature | Revenue operations | 0% | 14 of 63 | 0% | 25 | accepted challenger | ▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, LinkSquares held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · CLM · by segment
Mid-market▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 4% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 7 pointsRank 7 → 13 of 60
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 15 → 22 of 65
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLM | 4% | 0% | ▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 7 → 14 of 63 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated LinkSquares across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated LinkSquares across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct6 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative17 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained11 labelsNone
Negative7 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative42 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“LinkSquares offers AI-powered contract lifecycle management ... ideal for mid-market companies managing high volumes of contracts.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · CLM · direct prompt · alternative
“AI analytics, obligation tracking, clause search for large repositories. Strong post-signature management.” Grok 4.20 · CLM · comparative prompt · alternative
“Good options for your size include Ironclad, Conga, Agiloft, DocuSign CLM, SpotDraft, and LinkSquares” DeepSeek V4 Flash · CLM · scale prompt · alternative
“LinkSquares if your biggest problem is organizing and extracting useful information from a large backlog” GPT-6 Luna · CLM · direct prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as LinkSquares, over the 42 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and LinkSquares was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as LinkSquares, over the 42 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and LinkSquares was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named LinkSquares. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 37 of the 42 answers that named LinkSquares and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
conga.com21
bindlegal.com19
oneflow.com16
sirion.ai16
g2.com15
guideflow.com15
learn.g2.com15
larksuite.com14
lsuite.co12
ironcladapp.com11
154 of the 154 domain citations in answers naming LinkSquares came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
linksquares.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, LinkSquares takes 0% of first choices and PandaDoc takes 23%.ShowHide
Search and answers
linksquares.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, LinkSquares takes 0% of first choices and PandaDoc takes 23%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “contract lifecycle management platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best contract lifecycle management platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 2,900 a month (“linksquares”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 46 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 2,984 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 1,052 · 27 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,649
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 14 of 63 in CLM
Segment leader
23%
PandaDoc
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 42 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 37 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on linksquares.com
1,202
subdomains included
Content
826
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
20 · 13
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 640 | 5 | 2026-09-15 | CLM | |
| Conference or event | 90 | undated | CLM | ||
| Case study | 37 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 22 | 0 | 2025-01-08 | CLM | |
| Glossary or explainer | 20 | 1 | 2026-08-06 | CLM | |
| Template or tool | 8 | 0 | 2026-02-05 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 5 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 2 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 1 | undated | |||
| News or press | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-15August 2026 release roundup blog
- 2026-08-26July 2026 release roundup blog
- 2026-08-112026 inc. 5000 fastest growing companies blog
- 2026-08-06What is agentic clm guide glossary or explainer
- 2026-07-29Your contract repository costing you deals blog
- 2026-07-21Advances contract intelligence rebuilt smart ocr engine blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page linksquares.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow LinkSquares
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
LinkSquares is its own company.ShowHide
The company
LinkSquares is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- AI Contract Management Software
- For
- contract teams
- Price stated
- CLM Pricing isn't one-size-fits-all, because your contracting needs aren't either. linksquares.com/pricing
- Certifications
- SOC 2ISO-certifiedISO-certified security
- Customers named
- CommvaultThe E.W. Scripps CompanyAccession Risk Management GroupThe Force MultiplierManscapedCCC Intelligent SolutionsVivid SeatsLogos
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting
What LinkSquares's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: linksquares.com, linksquares.com/pricing, trust.linksquares.com, linksquares.com/solutions, linksquares.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when LinkSquares's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as LinkSquares, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for LinkSquares by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where LinkSquares is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name LinkSquares, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.