Small business▲+20Since September 2026: 8% → 28%, +20 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.
28%from 8% in September 2026
Cleared the floor by 9 pointsRank 4 → 2 of 53
1 category · RankedConcord
90Judge labels
25First choices
6Negative labels
13 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
25% in CLM for small business buyers
Rank 2 of 63 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
3 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 3% of its 35 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Concord →By buyer segmentStrongest at small business.
Small business2 of 53
25%42 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market2 of 63
19%35 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise12 of 65
2%12 labels
accepted challenger
In clm · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Concord for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract lifecycle management and e-signature | Revenue operations | 19% | 2 of 63 | 3% | 35 | accepted challenger | ▲+12Since September 2026: 6% → 18%, +12 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Concord moved past the floor in its one category, CLM, +12 points to 18%.
Best category · CLM · by segment
Mid-market▲+12Since September 2026: 6% → 18%, +12 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.
18%from 6% in September 2026
Cleared the floor by 1 pointRank 5 → 2 of 60
Enterprise▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 35 → 11 of 65
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLM | 6% | 18% | ▲+12Since September 2026: 6% → 18%, +12 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked. | Moved past the floor | Rank 5 → 2 of 63 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Concord across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Concord across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct20 labels10
Paraphrase12 labels1
Comparative14 labels5not counted in share
Budget-constrained30 labels11
Scale-constrained7 labels3
Negative7 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative90 labels in all, every segment counted; 25 of the 31 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“The best contract lifecycle management platform for a company with a limited budget is Concord, which has an entry tier priced at $499.” Llama 4 Maverick · CLM · budget prompt · first choice
“If you have 3–5 people and want simplicity: Concord ($499/month flat) is hard to beat for predictable costs and true CLM features.” Kimi K2 · CLM · budget prompt · first choice
“For a balance of affordability, ease of use, and mid-market focus, Concord is often the top recommendation.” Mistral Small · CLM · direct prompt · first choice
“"Concord offers a genuinely free tier with unlimited contracts, making it the best budget option"” Muse Glimmer 30B · CLM · budget prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“"The very small team (~22 employees) raises questions about support and migration capacity"” Muse Glimmer 30B · CLM · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Concord, over the 90 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Concord was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Concord, over the 90 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Concord was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Concord. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 89 of the 90 answers that named Concord and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
bindlegal.com61
conga.com47
contractsafe.com44
zylo.com44
larksuite.com43
concord.appYour site42
pandadoc.com35
learn.g2.com34
ironcladapp.com32
g2.com30
370 of the 412 domain citations in answers naming Concord came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
concord.app is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Concord takes 19% of first choices and PandaDoc takes 23%.ShowHide
Search and answers
concord.app is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Concord takes 19% of first choices and PandaDoc takes 23%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “contract lifecycle management platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best contract lifecycle management platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 246,000 a month (“concord”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 58,369 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 18,445 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 5,125 · 235 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,845
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
19%
rank 2 of 63 in CLM
Segment leader
23%
PandaDoc
- First choices
- 25 across its categories
- Named in
- 90 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 89 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on concord.app
1,184
subdomains included
Content
708
counted in the table below
Documentation
218
Product · Integration
11 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 563 | 22 | 2026-09-24 | CLM, CPQ | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 84 | 0 | 2026-06-15 | CLM | |
| Report or ebook | 27 | 0 | 2025-04-13 | CLM | |
| Comparison | 16 | 3 | 2026-09-21 | CLM | |
| Template or tool | 6 | 0 | 2026-06-10 | CRM | |
| Glossary or explainer | 4 | 0 | 2026-04-09 | ||
| Conference or event | 3 | 0 | 2024-01-15 | ||
| Podcast or video | 3 | 0 | 2025-04-14 | ||
| Case study | 2 | 0 | 2024-12-17 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-24Model context protocol utm blog
- 2026-09-24Severability clause meaning examples blog
- 2026-09-23Contract management for agencies blog
- 2026-09-22Delegation of authority matrix blog
- 2026-09-21Novation vs assignment comparison
- 2026-09-04How to write a contract blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page concord.app exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Concord
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Concord.ShowHide
The company
Concord.
ShowHideOn record
Wikidata- Website
- concord.app
- Headquarters
- Austin
- Founded
- 2014
Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- AI-native contract management platform that helps companies create, negotiate, sign, and manage contracts in a single workspace.
- For
- legal, finance, sales, and procurement teams
- Price stated
- Transparent monthly pricing for Concord's contract management software. All plans include unlimited e-signatures, AI extraction, and unlimited free viewers. concord.app/pricing
- Starting price
- 499 concord.app/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- free 14-day trial concord.app/pricing
- Integrations claimed
- 5000 concord.app/integrations
- Certifications
- eSIGNUETAGDPRSOC 2 Type IIU.S. ESIGN Act of 2000eIDASAdvanced electronic signature with qualified certificate
- Customers named
- PAAYYates ConstructionVecna. RoboticsGreenSlateLeoVegasPima Community CollegeNavarinoSevita
- Not stated on the pages read
- Hosting
What Concord's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: concord.app, concord.app/pricing, concord.app/solutions/concord-for-hr, concord.app/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Concord's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Concord, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Concord by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Concord is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Concord, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where Concord is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.ShowHide
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where Concord is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.
ShowHideConcord is among the products AI models recommend first in Contract lifecycle management and e-signature this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.