AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › Zoho Contracts · October 2026 Edition
Zoho · 1 category · Ranked

Zoho Contracts

26Judge labels
8First choices
1Negative labels
12 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
8% in CLM for mid-market buyers
Rank 5 of 63 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 8% of its 12 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Zoho Contracts →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In clm · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Zoho Contracts for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Contract lifecycle management and e-signatureRevenue operations8%5 of 638%12accepted challenger▼−5Since September 2026: 12% → 7%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, Zoho Contracts held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · CLM · by segment

Small business▼−4Since September 2026: 10% → 6%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
6%from 10% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 7 pointsRank 3 → 4 of 53
Mid-market▼−5Since September 2026: 12% → 7%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
7%from 12% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 6 pointsRank 4 → 5 of 60
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 62 → 43 of 65

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
CLM12%7%▼−5Since September 2026: 12% → 7%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 4 → 5 of 63

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Zoho Contracts across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.510001
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash10001
Perplexity Sonar01001
Grok 4.2000000
Mistral Small01001
DeepSeek V4 Flash01012
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash01001
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX01001
MiniMax M2.510102
GPT-6 Luna10001
Muse Glimmer 30B00101

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labelsNone
Paraphrase2 labelsNone
Comparative5 labelsNone
Budget-constrained14 labels8
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative26 labels in all, every segment counted; 8 of the 8 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Zoho Contracts offers the most affordable entry point at $30 per user per month with native e-signatures included” Claude Haiku 4.5 · CLM · budget prompt · first choice
“For a genuinely limited budget, I'd start with Zoho Contracts.” GPT-6 Luna · CLM · budget prompt · first choice
“Zoho Contracts — Best Overall Budget Option” MiniMax M2.5 · CLM · budget prompt · first choice
“Best Overall "True" CLM on a Tight Budget” Gemini 3.5 Flash · CLM · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Adoption issues — counterparties reportedly prefer negotiating outside the platform” DeepSeek V4 Flash · CLM · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Zoho Contracts, over the 26 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Zoho Contracts was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
ContractSafe10 of 261Not among the top eight
Agiloft8 of 260Not among the top eight
Icertis Contract Intelligence6 of 263Not among the top eight
ContractWorks6 of 261Not among the top eight
Contractbook5 of 261Not among the top eight
Sirion4 of 261Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Zoho Contracts. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 26 of the 26 answers that named Zoho Contracts and are not a share of its labels.

Search and answers

Where Zoho Contracts stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Searches for its name, Google
390 a month (“zoho contracts”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
8 a month
Its own site
It sits on Zoho's site (zoho.com), so there are no site figures for it alone

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
8%
rank 5 of 63 in CLM
Segment leader
23%
PandaDoc
First choices
8 across its categories
Named in
26 answers
Its own site cited
in 26 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Follow Zoho Contracts

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Zoho is the company behind Zoho Contracts.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
A comprehensive CLM solution for every business
Price stated
Simple and transparent pricing; no hidden terms or long contracts during purchase. zoho.com/contracts/why-zoho-contracts.html
Free plan or trial
Start your free trial! zoho.com/contracts/solutions
Hosting
global data centers
Customers named
LoylogicSolve CubeParaminds
Not stated on the pages read
Starting price, certifications

What Zoho Contracts's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: zoho.com/contracts/solutions, zoho.com/contracts/contract-manager.html, zoho.com/contracts/contract-approval.html, zoho.com/contracts/why-zoho-contracts.html, zoho.com/contracts/contract-templates.html. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Zoho Contracts's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Zoho Contracts, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Zoho Contracts by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Zoho Contracts is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Zoho Contracts, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at zoho.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.