Every category where a model named Spotio for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Territory and quota planning	Revenue operations	0%	43 of 103	20%	5	under 10 labels · led by CaptivateIQ at 30%
Digital sales rooms	Sales	0%	24 of 59	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Aligned at 40%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Spotio yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Spotio across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	2	0	0	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct4 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative4 labelsNone

Budget-constrained3 labelsNone

Scale-constrained3 labelsNone

Negative8 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative22 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Go with Spotio if your sales team travels frequently and struggles with content adoption.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Sales rooms · direct prompt · alternative

“Field sales teams needing territory and activity tracking” Mistral Small · Territory planning · comparative prompt · alternative

“Good for field sales teams with geographic territories” Mistral Small · Territory planning · scale prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Devastating app store ratings: 3.4 on iOS, 2.2 on Google Play” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Territory planning · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Spotio, over the 22 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Spotio was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Badger Maps17 of 222Not in the top three

Fullcast13 of 223Not in the top three

Anaplan12 of 222Not in the top three

Maptive12 of 221Not in the top three

eSpatial12 of 220Not in the top three

Salesforce Maps11 of 220Not in the top three

Varicent10 of 221Not in the top three

CaptivateIQ9 of 221Not in the top three

Workday Adaptive Planning5 of 221Not in the top three

Xactly AlignStar5 of 220Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Spotio. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 22 answers that named Spotio and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

fitsmallbusiness.com3

guideflow.com3

maptive.com3

pipeline.zoominfo.com3

zipdo.co3

articsledge.com2

captivateiq.com2

cleverly.co2

pipedrive.com2

salesmotion.io2

Twenty-five of the twenty-five domain citations in answers naming Spotio came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

fitsmallbusiness.com/territory-management-software3

maptive.com/15-best-sales-territory-mapping-software3

pipeline.zoominfo.com/sales/sales-territory-management-software3

articsledge.com/post/territory-planning-software2

captivateiq.com/blog/territory-planning-software-20262

cleverly.co/blog/sales-territory-mapping-software2

guideflow.com/blog/sales-territory-mapping-software2

pipedrive.com/en/blog/sales-territory-management-tools2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Spotio

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Spotio; a claim can dispute any of them.

SPOTIO 3

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Spotio's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Spotio, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at spotio.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.