Every category where a model named Salesforce Maps for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Territory and quota planning	Revenue operations	0%	23 of 103	23%	22	accepted challenger
Lead routing and management	Sales	0%	94 of 104	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by LeadAngel at 32%
Retail, proximity and IoT marketing	Marketing	0%	103 of 131	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Radar at 19%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Salesforce Maps yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Salesforce Maps across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	1	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	1	1	3
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	2	0	1	3
Mistral Small	1	1	0	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	2	2
Llama 4 Maverick	1	2	0	3
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	2	1	3
Kimi K2	1	2	0	3
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct8 labelsNone

Paraphrase2 labelsNone

Comparative24 labelsNone

Budget-constrained12 labels1

Scale-constrained10 labels1

Negative9 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative65 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“frictionless integration with no data migration needed for existing Salesforce users” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Territory planning · comparative prompt · alternative

“Best for Geographic & Field Sales Teams: Salesforce Maps & Sales Planning” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Territory planning · direct prompt · alternative

“Salesforce Maps/Planning for seamless CRM integration without new tools.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Territory planning · direct prompt · alternative

“Native Salesforce with minimal new vendors | Salesforce Maps” Kimi K2 · Territory planning · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“$75/user/month, pricey as an add-on.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Territory planning · budget prompt · hard negative

“Be cautious of purchasing massive, full-suite Revenue Operations platforms ... Salesforce Maps Enterprise” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Territory planning · negative prompt · soft negative

“Weak for true weighted-capacity math (ramp %, attrition modeling); heavier setup and Salesforce-bound.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Territory planning · comparative prompt · soft negative

“CRM-native (Salesforce) is simplest for basic use but lacks deep capacity modeling.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Territory planning · comparative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Salesforce Maps, over the 64 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Salesforce Maps was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Anaplan44 of 649Not in the top three

Fullcast38 of 647Not in the top three

CaptivateIQ36 of 6410Not in the top three

eSpatial36 of 643Not in the top three

Maptive33 of 644Not in the top three

Varicent33 of 643Not in the top three

Workday Adaptive Planning19 of 641Not in the top three

QuotaPath18 of 643Not in the top three

Badger Maps17 of 642Not in the top three

MapBusinessOnline14 of 643Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Salesforce Maps. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 9 of the 64 answers that named Salesforce Maps and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

articsledge.com6

lative.ai6

pipeline.zoominfo.com6

bitscale.ai5

captivateiq.com5

guideflow.com5

anaplan.com4

gitnux.org4

salesmotion.io4

varicent.com4

Forty-nine of the forty-nine domain citations in answers naming Salesforce Maps came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

articsledge.com/post/territory-planning-software6

pipeline.zoominfo.com/sales/sales-territory-management-software6

bitscale.ai/blogs/best-territory-planning-tools5

captivateiq.com/blog/territory-planning-software-20265

lative.ai/blog/sales-territory-planning-software5

guideflow.com/blog/territory-planning-software4

salesmotion.io/blog/sales-territory-mapping-software4

worldmetrics.org/best/territory-planning-software4

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Salesforce Maps

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Salesforce Maps; a claim can dispute any of them.

Salesforce 1Salesforce (Territory Management/Maps + Sales Planning) 1Salesforce (Territory Planning / Maps / ETM) 1Salesforce Maps & Sales Planning 1Salesforce Maps + Sales Planning 1Salesforce Maps Enterprise 1Salesforce Maps and Sales Planning 1Salesforce Maps/Sales Planning 1Salesforce Maps/Territory Planning 1

The company

Salesforce is the company behind Salesforce Maps.

Website: salesforce.com
Headquarters: San Francisco, United States
Founded: 1999
Employees: about 35,000 (2019)
Ownership: Public, CRM on New York Stock Exchange

From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Salesforce Maps's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Salesforce Maps, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at salesforce.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.