Small business▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 12 → 22 of 94
1 category · RankedeSpatial
48Judge labels
0First choices
13Negative labels
13 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Territory planning for mid-market buyers
Rank 27 of 123 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 19% of its 16 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of eSpatial →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business21 of 103
0%17 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market27 of 123
0%16 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise71 of 92
0%15 labels
criticized challenger
In territory planning · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named eSpatial for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Territory and quota planning | Revenue operations | 0% | 27 of 123 | 19% | 16 | accepted challenger | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, eSpatial held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Territory planning · by segment
Mid-market▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 8 → 27 of 116
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 68 → 62 of 83
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Territory planning | 2% | 0% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 8 → 27 of 123 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated eSpatial across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated eSpatial across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct8 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative12 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained10 labelsNone
Scale-constrained8 labelsNone
Negative10 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative48 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“eSpatial is best for mid-market teams that want algorithmic territory balancing and clear visual mapping.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Territory planning · direct prompt · alternative
“pairs well with tools like eSpatial if needed ... Mapping-focused with territory optimization” Grok 4.20 · Territory planning · direct prompt · alternative
“Priced from $1,495/year, eSpatial provides automated territory balancing and optimization” Mistral Small · Territory planning · budget prompt · alternative
“Go with eSpatial if your primary need is geographic territory design” Kimi K2 · Territory planning · direct prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Most true enterprise territory tools (e.g., eSpatial Pro, Varicent, Xactly) start at $5K–$10K+ per year, which is often too high for SMBs.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Territory planning · budget prompt · soft negative
“Single-Dimension "Map-Only" Visualizers (e.g., eSpatial, Mapline, Maptive)... Geographic mapping is not the same as territory planning.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Territory planning · negative prompt · soft negative
“the software periodically begins to freeze up... it is mapping-first, so you should not expect quota or capacity planning” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Territory planning · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as eSpatial, over the 48 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and eSpatial was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as eSpatial, over the 48 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and eSpatial was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named eSpatial. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 48 of the 48 answers that named eSpatial and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
captivateiq.com43
guideflow.com39
pipeline.zoominfo.com37
prospeo.io23
gitnux.org21
espatial.comYour site19
varicent.com19
worldmetrics.org17
lative.ai14
spotio.com14
227 of the 246 domain citations in answers naming eSpatial came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
espatial.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, eSpatial takes 0% of first choices and CaptivateIQ Planning takes 36%.ShowHide
Search and answers
espatial.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, eSpatial takes 0% of first choices and CaptivateIQ Planning takes 36%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “sales territory and quota planning tool”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best sales territory and quota planning tool”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 480 a month (“espatial”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 3 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 9,075 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 1,216 · 46 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,153
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 27 of 123 in territory planning
Segment leader
36%
CaptivateIQ Planning
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 48 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 48 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on espatial.com
148
subdomains included
Content
84
counted in the table below
Documentation
2
Product · Integration
14 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 49 | 9 | 2026-09-15 | ||
| Case study | 11 | 0 | 2024-01-24 | ||
| Comparison | 11 | 0 | 2026-06-02 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 6 | 0 | 2023-05-18 | ||
| Report or ebook | 5 | 0 | 2026-05-18 | ||
| Template or tool | 2 | 0 | 2025-10-16 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-15Route optimization for field sales teams blog
- 2026-09-10Field sales change management playbook blog
- 2026-09-03Best sales territory management software tools blog
- 2026-08-30Espatial territory manager ai security blog
- 2026-08-25Draw radius map blog
- 2026-08-21Territory alignment team morale blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page espatial.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as eSpatial
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as eSpatial; a claim can dispute any of them.
Maptive / eSpatial 1eSpatial Pro 1
Follow eSpatial
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
eSpatial is its own company.ShowHide
The company
eSpatial is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- The Mapping Software Platform for Data Visualization, Territory Design & Route Planning
- For
- Sales Leadership & Operations; Operations & Logistics; Marketing & Growth Teams
- Price stated
- Mapping Pro: $499 per user per year; Professional Territory Manager: $2,665 per user per year; Advanced Territory Manager: $4,999 per user per year. espatial.com/pricing
- Starting price
- 499 espatial.com/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- full-featured 7-day free trial with no credit card required espatial.com
- Certifications
- ISO 27001 enterprise security standardsISO 27001:2013 certificationISO 27001:2022 certified
- Hosting
- Ashburn, Virginia, USAPhoenix, Arizona, USANorth AmericaUSA
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations, customers
What eSpatial's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: espatial.com, espatial.com/pricing, espatial.com/security, espatial.com/features/lasso-tool. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when eSpatial's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as eSpatial, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for eSpatial by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where eSpatial is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name eSpatial, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.