| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales commissions and incentive compensation | Revenue operations | 15% | 3 of 47 | 10% | 48 | accepted challenger | ▲+11Since September 2026: 4% → 15%, +11 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Territory and quota planning | Revenue operations | 4% | 5 of 123 | 0% | 12 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 4% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Commissions | 4% | 15% | ▲+11Since September 2026: 4% → 15%, +11 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked. | Moved past the floor | Rank 6 → 3 of 47 |
| Territory planning | 4% | 4% | =heldSince September 2026: 4% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 3 → 5 of 123 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 9 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Grok 4.20 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 6 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 6 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“QuotaPath — best for SMB and mid-market revenue teams that want faster setup, transparent pricing, and straightforward commission automation.” GPT-5.4 mini · Commissions · comparative prompt · first choice
“For the most cost-effective solution, QuotaPath offers the best value with transparent pricing and no hidden fees” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Territory planning · budget prompt · first choice
“If you want one name most 2026 guides cite as the default mid-market pick, it’s QuotaPath for transparency and speed” Muse Glimmer 30B · Commissions · direct prompt · first choice
“QuotaPath stands out as one of the strongest options among sales commission management platforms” Grok 4.20 · Commissions · budget prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Avoid QuotaPath if you have fewer than ~15 users, since the $525/month platform fee makes the total cost disproportionately high” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Commissions · budget prompt · hard negative
“QuotaPath Growth is $35 per user per month + $525 monthly platform fee, which is overkill for a very limited budget” Muse Glimmer 30B · Commissions · budget prompt · soft negative
“its current Growth plan lists a $525/month platform fee, billed annually, so I wouldn't call it the budget pick” GPT-6 Luna · Commissions · budget prompt · soft negative
“they stack a mandatory $525/month platform fee on top, which makes it less ideal for micro-budgets” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Commissions · budget prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 178 of the 179 answers that named QuotaPath and are not a share of its labels.
700 of the 792 domain citations in answers naming QuotaPath came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 621 | 28 | 2026-09-24 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 92 | 0 | 2024-12-27 | ||
| Case study | 44 | 4 | 2026-09-08 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 38 | 3 | 2026-08-25 | ||
| Template or tool | 17 | 3 | 2026-09-22 | ||
| Comparison | 16 | 1 | 2026-08-18 | ||
| Conference or event | 9 | 4 | 2026-08-21 | ||
| Report or ebook | 2 | 0 | 2022-06-27 | ||
| Podcast or video | 2 | 0 | 2023-12-27 |
As the event pages on quotapath.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
Every page quotapath.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What QuotaPath's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: quotapath.com, quotapath.com/pricing, trust.quotapath.com, quotapath.com/customers, quotapath.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when QuotaPath's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as QuotaPath, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for QuotaPath by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
QuotaPath is among the products AI models recommend first in Sales commissions and incentive compensation this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.