AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › Sales Cookie · October 2026 Edition
2 categories · Ranked

Sales Cookie

50Judge labels
15First choices
1Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
21% in Commissions for small business buyers
Rank 7 of 47 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 8 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentStrongest at small business.
In commissions · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Sales Cookie for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Sales commissions and incentive compensationRevenue operations7%7 of 470%8under 10 labels · led by CaptivateIQ at 25%=heldSince September 2026: 8% → 7%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Territory and quota planningRevenue operations0%70 of 1230%2under 10 labels · led by CaptivateIQ Planning at 36%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.

Movement

Since September 2026, Sales Cookie held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · Commissions · by segment

Small business▲+19Since September 2026: 4% → 22%, +19 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.
22%from 4% in September 2026
Cleared the floor by 8 pointsRank 6 → 2 of 40
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 8% → 7%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
7%from 8% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 5 → 7 of 46
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 45 → 16 of 31

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Commissions8%7%=heldSince September 2026: 8% → 7%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 5 → 7 of 47
Territory planning0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 70 of 123, unchanged

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Sales Cookie across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.510001
GPT-5.4 mini01001
Gemini 3.5 Flash01001
Perplexity Sonar01001
Grok 4.2000000
Mistral Small10001
DeepSeek V4 Flash10001
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash01001
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX10102
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00101

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct6 labels2
Paraphrase4 labelsNone
Comparative7 labels2not counted in share
Budget-constrained24 labels13
Scale-constrained4 labelsNone
Negative5 labels2not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative50 labels in all, every segment counted; 15 of the 19 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Commissionly and Sales Cookie are the top recommendations due to their low cost and simplicity” Mistral Small · Commissions · budget prompt · first choice
“start with Commissionly or Sales Cookie (both under $100/user/month)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Commissions · budget prompt · first choice
“QuotaPath or Sales Cookie are likely your best bets” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Commissions · budget prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend starting with Commissionly or Sales Cookie.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Commissions · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Sales Cookie, over the 50 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Sales Cookie was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
QuotaPath43 of 5012Not among the top eight
Commissionly28 of 507Not among the top eight
CaptivateIQ23 of 502Not among the top eight
Salesforce Spiff22 of 500Not among the top eight
Xactly Incent15 of 501Not among the top eight
Everstage14 of 501Not among the top eight
Qobra11 of 500Not among the top eight
EasyComp9 of 500Not among the top eight
Varicent9 of 500Not among the top eight
Visdum7 of 500Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Sales Cookie. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 50 of the 50 answers that named Sales Cookie and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

qobra.co41
guideflow.com38
everstage.com30
g2.com25
learn.g2.com22
quotapath.com20
captivateiq.com16
itechguides.com16
capterra.com14
croclub.com14

236 of the 236 domain citations in answers naming Sales Cookie came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

salescookie.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Sales Cookie takes 7% of first choices and CaptivateIQ takes 25%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “sales commission management platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best sales commission management platform”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
260 a month (“sales cookie”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
138 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 437 a month
Searches its site ranks for
474 · 11 in the top three
Sites linking to it
332
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
13 ads · 11 text, 2 video · 4 shown in the last 30 days

First shown October 2021, as Ninth Floor Technologies, verified.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
7%
rank 7 of 47 in commissions
Segment leader
25%
CaptivateIQ
First choices
15 across its categories
Named in
50 answers
Its own site cited
in 50 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on salescookie.com
289
subdomains included
Content
184
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
0 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog16472026-08-11
Glossary or explainer802024-05-01
Comparison602026-06-02
Template or tool202021-09-02
Podcast or video202026-05-29
Case study102026-05-05
Report or ebook102019-05-01
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page salescookie.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Sales Cookie

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Sales Cookie is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
AI Sales Commission Software
Price stated
$30.00-$50.00 salescookie.com
Starting price
$30.00 salescookie.com
Free plan or trial
Free Trial salescookie.com
Integrations claimed
30 salescookie.com
Certifications
ISO27018HIPAAGDPRSOC 2
Not stated on the pages read
Hosting, customers

What Sales Cookie's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: salescookie.com, salescookie.com/Home/Pricing, salescookie.com/Home/Security. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Sales Cookie's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Sales Cookie, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Sales Cookie by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Sales Cookie is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Sales Cookie, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at salescookie.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.