GTM AI Index
Index Vendors › Sales Cookie · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Sales Cookie

32Judge labels
7First choices
2Negative labels
11 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
8% in Commissions for mid-market buyers
Rank 5 of 51 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 9% of its 11 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In commissions · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Sales Cookie for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Sales commissions and incentive compensationRevenue operations8%5 of 519%11accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Sales Cookie yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Sales Cookie across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.510001
GPT-5.4 mini00101
Gemini 3.5 Flash01001
Perplexity Sonar10102
Grok 4.1 Fast01012
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash01001
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash01001
Kimi K210001
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.510001

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labelsNone
Paraphrase2 labelsNone
Comparative5 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained17 labels7
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative3 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative32 labels in all, every segment counted; 7 of the 8 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Commissionly and Sales Cookie stand out as the most cost-effective options, particularly if you have a small team” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Commissions · budget prompt · first choice
“Sales Cookie offers the best balance of features, affordability, and flexibility with no long-term commitment.” MiniMax M2.5 · Commissions · budget prompt · first choice
“Sales Cookie if you want the best overall balance of affordability and functionality” Perplexity Sonar · Commissions · budget prompt · first choice
“Sales Cookie ⭐ Best Overall Value” Kimi K2 · Commissions · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“simpler ones like Sales Cookie for smaller teams” Grok 4.1 Fast · Commissions · direct prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Sales Cookie, over the 32 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Sales Cookie was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
QuotaPath31 of 3213Not in the top three
Commissionly21 of 326Not in the top three
CaptivateIQ16 of 321Not in the top three
Xactly12 of 320Not in the top three
Salesforce Spiff9 of 320Not in the top three
Visdum9 of 320Not in the top three
Everstage7 of 321Not in the top three
Qobra6 of 320Not in the top three
Varicent6 of 320Not in the top three
Performio5 of 320Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Sales Cookie. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 9 of the 32 answers that named Sales Cookie and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

everstage.com8
technologyadvice.com7
captivateiq.com5
learn.g2.com5
qobra.co5
capterra.com4
forma.ai4
g2.com4
guideflow.com4
nektar.ai4

Fifty of the fifty domain citations in answers naming Sales Cookie came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Sales Cookie

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Sales Cookie; a claim can dispute any of them.
SalesCookie 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Sales Cookie's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Sales Cookie, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at salescookie.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack