Small business▲+1Since September 2026: 15% → 16%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
16%from 15% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 2 → 3 of 40
1 category · RankedCommissionly
55Judge labels
15First choices
3Negative labels
12 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
17% in Commissions for small business buyers
Rank 4 of 47 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 17% of its 12 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Commissionly →By buyer segmentStrongest at small business.
Small business3 of 44
17%42 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market4 of 47
10%12 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise31 of 34
0%1 label
under the label threshold
In commissions · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Commissionly for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales commissions and incentive compensation | Revenue operations | 10% | 4 of 47 | 17% | 12 | accepted challenger | ▼−4Since September 2026: 14% → 9%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Commissionly held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Commissions · by segment
Mid-market▼−4Since September 2026: 14% → 9%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
9%from 14% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 7 pointsRank 4 of 46, unchanged
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 38 → 27 of 31
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Commissions | 14% | 9% | ▼−4Since September 2026: 14% → 9%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 4 of 47, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Commissionly across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Commissionly across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct8 labels2
Paraphrase6 labels2
Comparative10 labels5not counted in share
Budget-constrained20 labels11
Scale-constrained4 labelsNone
Negative7 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative55 labels in all, every segment counted; 15 of the 20 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Commissionly and Sales Cookie are the top recommendations due to their low cost and simplicity” Mistral Small · Commissions · budget prompt · first choice
“Commissionly is the most frequently recommended budget-friendly choice in 2025-2026 round-ups” Muse Glimmer 30B · Commissions · budget prompt · first choice
“For a company with a limited budget, I'd recommend starting with Commissionly or Sales Cookie.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Commissions · budget prompt · first choice
“start with Commissionly or Sales Cookie (both under $100/user/month)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Commissions · budget prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Who should avoid: Companies with complex commission plans or those needing deep custom reporting.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Commissions · negative prompt · soft negative
“may not be suitable for larger teams or those with complex commission structures” Mistral Small · Commissions · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Commissionly, over the 55 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Commissionly was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Commissionly, over the 55 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Commissionly was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Commissionly. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 54 of the 55 answers that named Commissionly and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
qobra.co50
everstage.com42
guideflow.com38
g2.com26
croclub.com24
learn.g2.com24
quotapath.com18
getapp.com17
captivateiq.com16
itechguides.com15
270 of the 270 domain citations in answers naming Commissionly came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
commissionly.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Commissionly takes 10% of first choices and CaptivateIQ takes 25%.ShowHide
Search and answers
commissionly.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Commissionly takes 10% of first choices and CaptivateIQ takes 25%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “sales commission management platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best sales commission management platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 210 a month (“commissionly”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 447 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 401 · 5 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 300
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
10%
rank 4 of 47 in commissions
Segment leader
25%
CaptivateIQ
- First choices
- 15 across its categories
- Named in
- 55 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 54 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on commissionly.io
361
subdomains included
Content
13
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 11 | 8 | 2026-09-24 | ||
| Comparison | 2 | 2 | 2026-09-09 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-24Where ai fits in your plan to pay workflow blog
- 2026-09-24When to outsource payroll processing or automate commissions yourself blog
- 2026-09-11The commission mistake your payroll provider cant catch blog
- 2026-09-09Commission management systems vs spreadsheets comparison
- 2026-08-18Territory and quota management blog
- 2026-08-11Ach vs wire vs check for agent commissions comparison
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page commissionly.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Commissionly
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Commissionly is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Commissionly is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Sales Commission Software
- For
- Payments, insurance and businesses
- Price stated
- Competitive Pricing commissionly.io
- Customers named
- Netcom Paysystems
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting
What Commissionly's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: commissionly.io. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Commissionly's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Commissionly, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Commissionly by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Commissionly is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Commissionly, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.