Every category where a model named Commissionly for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Sales commissions and incentive compensation	Revenue operations	14%	4 of 51	8%	12	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Commissionly yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Commissionly across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	0	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	0	1	2
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	0	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	0	0	0	1
Mistral Small	1	0	0	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	0	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	0	0	1
Kimi K2	0	1	0	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	0	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct8 labelsNone

Paraphrase7 labelsNone

Comparative10 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained21 labels15

Scale-constrained4 labelsNone

Negative10 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative60 labels in all, every segment counted; 15 of the 17 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Commissionly offers the best combination of affordability, speed of implementation, and essential features” Mistral Small · Commissions · budget prompt · first choice

“For a limited budget, Commissionly and Sales Cookie stand out as the most cost-effective options” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Commissions · budget prompt · first choice

“Commissionly is the most budget-oriented choice for very small teams with simple commission plans” Perplexity Sonar · Commissions · budget prompt · first choice

“The best sales commission management platform for a company with a limited budget is Commissionly.” Llama 4 Maverick · Commissions · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“These platforms trade flexibility for ease of use... you may quickly hit the limits” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Commissions · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Commissionly, over the 60 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Commissionly was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

QuotaPath55 of 6033Not in the top three

CaptivateIQ32 of 601Not in the top three

Qobra28 of 600Not in the top three

Salesforce Spiff26 of 600Not in the top three

Visdum23 of 601Not in the top three

Sales Cookie21 of 603Not in the top three

Xactly20 of 600Not in the top three

EasyComp18 of 601Not in the top three

Everstage18 of 601Not in the top three

Varicent9 of 600Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Commissionly. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 8 of the 60 answers that named Commissionly and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

everstage.com8

qobra.co6

technologyadvice.com6

captivateiq.com5

forma.ai5

guideflow.com5

visdum.com5

learn.g2.com4

nektar.ai4

capterra.com3

Fifty-one of the fifty-one domain citations in answers naming Commissionly came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

everstage.com/10-best-sales-commission-software6

qobra.co/blog/top-sales-commission-tools5

forma.ai/resources/article/commissions-software4

learn.g2.com/best-sales-compensation-software4

nektar.ai/9-sales-commission-software4

qobra.co/blog/best-commission-management-software4

qobra.co/blog/best-sales-commission-software-for-high-growth-companies4

qobra.co/blog/best-sales-commission-tracking-software4

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Commissionly

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Commissionly; a claim can dispute any of them.

Commissionly / EasyComp 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Commissionly's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Commissionly, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at commissionly.io is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.