AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › Everstage · October 2026 Edition
4 categories · Ranked

Everstage

134Judge labels
16First choices
13Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
4Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
16% in Commissions for mid-market buyers
Rank 2 of 47 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
6 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 5% of its 42 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Everstage →
By buyer segmentStrongest at mid-market.
In commissions · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Everstage for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Sales commissions and incentive compensationRevenue operations16%2 of 475%42accepted challenger▼−9Since September 2026: 25% → 17%, −9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Territory and quota planningRevenue operations6%2 of 1230%12accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 4% → 6%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Sales gamificationSales0%23 of 640%4under 10 labels · led by Spinify at 31%
CPQRevenue operations0%51 of 660%1under 10 labels · led by DealHub at 57%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.

Movement

Since September 2026, Everstage held within the floor in all four categories: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · Commissions · by segment

Small business▲+5Since September 2026: 2% → 7%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
7%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 6 pointsRank 12 → 4 of 40
Mid-market▼−9Since September 2026: 25% → 17%, −9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
17%from 25% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 2 pointsRank 1 → 2 of 46
Enterprise▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 7 → 11 of 31

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Commissions25%17%▼−9Since September 2026: 25% → 17%, −9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 1 → 2 of 47
Territory planning4%6%▲+2Since September 2026: 4% → 6%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 4 → 2 of 123
Sales gamification0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 23 of 64, unchanged
CPQ0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 51 of 66, unchanged

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Everstage across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.504004
GPT-5.4 mini11002
Gemini 3.5 Flash24006
Perplexity Sonar01102
Grok 4.2013217
Mistral Small21003
DeepSeek V4 Flash25108
Llama 4 Maverick02406
Qwen 3.7 Flash30003
Kimi K223106
GLM 4.7 FlashX12003
MiniMax M2.511114
GPT-6 Luna11002
Muse Glimmer 30B02103

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct25 labels7
Paraphrase37 labels7
Comparative30 labels2not counted in share
Budget-constrained4 labelsNone
Scale-constrained22 labels2
Negative16 labels3not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative134 labels in all, every segment counted; 16 of the 21 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Known for a modern, sleek UI, highly responsive customer support, and no-code plan building. Very popular for mid-market SaaS companies.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Commissions · scale prompt · first choice
“Everstage is also a very strong pick if your priority is self-serve admin, faster implementation, and rep-facing usability” GPT-5.4 mini · Commissions · direct prompt · first choice
“Everstage or Visdum offer the best combination of modern features, mid-market pricing, and fast implementation” Kimi K2 · Commissions · direct prompt · first choice
“Real-time visibility, no-code plan builder, Salesforce-native, strong rep UX | Less mature for global payroll” Mistral Small · Commissions · scale prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Complex navigation: Users find it cumbersome to access data... CRM sync delays” MiniMax M2.5 · Commissions · negative prompt · soft negative
“Issues: Occasional CRM sync delays ... opaque pricing” Grok 4.20 · Commissions · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Everstage, over the 134 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Everstage was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Salesforce Spiff88 of 1341Not among the top eight
Varicent50 of 1347Not among the top eight
SAP Commissions16 of 1340Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Everstage. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 134 of the 134 answers that named Everstage and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

everstage.comYour site106
qobra.co90
captivateiq.com85
guideflow.com64
g2.com56
learn.g2.com55
quotapath.com53
forma.ai50
croclub.com34
visdum.com30

517 of the 623 domain citations in answers naming Everstage came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

everstage.com ranks first on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Everstage takes 16% of first choices and CaptivateIQ takes 25%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “sales commission management platform”
5
Position for “best sales commission management platform”
1
Searches for its name, Google
1,300 a month (“everstage”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
15 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 26,345 a month
Searches its site ranks for
3,215 · 490 in the top three
Sites linking to it
1,647
Paid Google search
3 searches its ads show for, about 11 clicks and $1,064 a month (estimate)
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
96 ads · 88 text, 5 video, 3 image · 41 shown in the last 30 days

First shown June 2022, as Everstage Inc, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 47 in the year, 49 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
16%
rank 2 of 47 in commissions
Segment leader
25%
CaptivateIQ
First choices
16 across its categories
Named in
134 answers
Its own site cited
in 134 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on everstage.com
925
subdomains included
Content
470
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
15 · 1
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog183182026-09-22
Podcast or video8302025-06-08
Conference or event60undated
Comparison5122026-08-10
Glossary or explainer3102026-04-20
Case study23undated
News or press18undated
Report or ebook12undated
Template or tool9undated

Events in person

Last twelve months

As the event pages on everstage.com state them, read September 28, 2026.

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page everstage.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Everstage

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Everstage is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
AI-first Revenue Platform that unifies sales commissions, quoting, and revenue planning into one single solution - closing the loop from how an offer is priced to how the rep is paid to close it.
For
RevOps / Sales Comp
Price stated
Pricing is per payee, and implementation, onboarding, and support are included. You get a custom quote based on your team size and how complex your plans are. everstage.com
Free plan or trial
free proof of concept on your real plan everstage.com
Certifications
SOC 2 Type IIGDPRCCPASOC 1 Type IIISO 27001
Customers named
chargebeeNotionMonexHood ContainerLeadventureRocket LawyerDiligentStarburst
Not stated on the pages read
Starting price, integrations, hosting

What Everstage's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: everstage.com, everstage.com/pricing, everstage.com/platform, everstage.com/customer-stories, everstage.com/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Everstage's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Everstage, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Everstage by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Everstage is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Everstage, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at everstage.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.

Badges

Wins only: a badge exists where Everstage is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.
ShowHide
Sales commissions and incentive compensation

Everstage is among the products AI models recommend first in Sales commissions and incentive compensation this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.

Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Among AI models' top three in Sales commissions and incentive compensation, October 2026 Edition, GTM AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://gtm-ai-index.com/revops/sales-commissions-and-incentive-compensation/"><img src="https://gtm-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/everstage--sales-commissions-and-incentive-compensation-wide.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Sales commissions and incentive compensation, October 2026 Edition, GTM AI Recommendation Index" width="320" height="104"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Sales commissions and incentive compensation standing, where the claim can be checked.

Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Among AI models' top three in Sales commissions and incentive compensation, October 2026 Edition, GTM AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://gtm-ai-index.com/revops/sales-commissions-and-incentive-compensation/"><img src="https://gtm-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/everstage--sales-commissions-and-incentive-compensation-square.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Sales commissions and incentive compensation, October 2026 Edition, GTM AI Recommendation Index" width="240" height="240"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Sales commissions and incentive compensation standing, where the claim can be checked.

Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Among AI models' top three in Sales commissions and incentive compensation, October 2026 Edition, GTM AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://gtm-ai-index.com/revops/sales-commissions-and-incentive-compensation/"><img src="https://gtm-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/everstage--sales-commissions-and-incentive-compensation-compact.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Sales commissions and incentive compensation, October 2026 Edition, GTM AI Recommendation Index" width="200" height="56"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Sales commissions and incentive compensation standing, where the claim can be checked.

Territory and quota planning

Everstage is among the products AI models recommend first in Territory and quota planning this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.

Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Among AI models' top three in Territory and quota planning, October 2026 Edition, GTM AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://gtm-ai-index.com/revops/territory-and-quota-planning/"><img src="https://gtm-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/everstage--territory-and-quota-planning-wide.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Territory and quota planning, October 2026 Edition, GTM AI Recommendation Index" width="320" height="104"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Territory and quota planning standing, where the claim can be checked.

Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Among AI models' top three in Territory and quota planning, October 2026 Edition, GTM AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://gtm-ai-index.com/revops/territory-and-quota-planning/"><img src="https://gtm-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/everstage--territory-and-quota-planning-square.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Territory and quota planning, October 2026 Edition, GTM AI Recommendation Index" width="240" height="240"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Territory and quota planning standing, where the claim can be checked.

Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Among AI models' top three in Territory and quota planning, October 2026 Edition, GTM AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://gtm-ai-index.com/revops/territory-and-quota-planning/"><img src="https://gtm-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/everstage--territory-and-quota-planning-compact.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Territory and quota planning, October 2026 Edition, GTM AI Recommendation Index" width="200" height="56"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Territory and quota planning standing, where the claim can be checked.

Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.