Every category where a model named Qobra for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Sales commissions and incentive compensation	Revenue operations	18%	3 of 51	0%	41	accepted challenger
Territory and quota planning	Revenue operations	0%	41 of 103	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by CaptivateIQ at 30%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Qobra yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Qobra across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	3	0	4
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	2	2
Perplexity Sonar	1	2	0	3
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	3	0	4
Mistral Small	1	2	2	5
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1	2	4
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	3	4
Qwen 3.7 Flash	3	0	0	3
Kimi K2	2	1	3	6
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	3	0	3
MiniMax M2.5	0	2	3	5

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct20 labels5

Paraphrase15 labels4

Comparative23 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained8 labels1

Scale-constrained19 labels5

Negative10 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative95 labels in all, every segment counted; 15 of the 17 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Qobra is best for mid-market and high-growth B2B companies (50-500 sales reps) prioritizing fast implementation, sales rep adoption, and RevOps agility.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Commissions · direct prompt · first choice

“Qobra - Best for mid-market and enterprise teams (50-5,000+ reps) that want a single commission tool trusted by Operations, Finance, and Sales.” Llama 4 Maverick · Commissions · direct prompt · first choice

“Qobra | Fastest implementation (1-2 weeks), 95%+ rep adoption, AI-native features | You need speed and high adoption” Kimi K2 · Commissions · scale prompt · first choice

“The "safest" bets for most organizations appear to be Qobra (fastest implementation, transparent pricing)” Kimi K2 · Commissions · negative prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Qobra, over the 95 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Qobra was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

CaptivateIQ74 of 9515Compare →

QuotaPath67 of 9528Not in the top three

Everstage63 of 9514Compare →

Salesforce Spiff62 of 951Not in the top three

Performio40 of 953Not in the top three

Xactly37 of 953Not in the top three

Visdum36 of 951Not in the top three

Commissionly28 of 955Not in the top three

Varicent21 of 951Not in the top three

EasyComp20 of 952Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Qobra. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 12 of the 95 answers that named Qobra and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

everstage.com11

qobra.coYour site10

guideflow.com9

captivateiq.com8

forma.ai7

learn.g2.com7

quotapath.com7

technologyadvice.com7

visdum.com6

getcentify.com5

Sixty-seven of the seventy-seven domain citations in answers naming Qobra came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

everstage.com/10-best-sales-commission-software9

qobra.co/blog/top-sales-commission-tools8

learn.g2.com/best-sales-compensation-software7

quotapath.com/blog/best-sales-compensation-software6

captivateiq.com/blog/best-sales-compensation-software5

getcentify.com/best-sales-commission-software5

guideflow.com/blog/sales-commission-software5

qobra.co/blog/best-sales-commission-tracking-software5

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Qobra's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Qobra, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at qobra.co is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.