| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales commissions and incentive compensation | Revenue operations | 0% | 15 of 47 | 26% | 46 | criticized challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Territory and quota planning | Revenue operations | 0% | 30 of 123 | 0% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by CaptivateIQ Planning at 36% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Sales gamification | Sales | 0% | 61 of 64 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Spinify at 31% |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Territory planning | 2% | 0% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 13 → 30 of 123 |
| Commissions | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 10 → 15 of 47 |
| Sales gamification | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 61 of 64, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 7 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Compare them against newer players like Spiff, CaptivateIQ, and Everstage, which tend to have better UI and faster implementations” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Commissions · negative prompt · alternative
“If your entire sales operation, quoting, and billing reside natively inside Salesforce, Spiff offers deep, real-time integration.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Commissions · scale prompt · alternative
“Salesforce Spiff if your team already runs on Salesforce and wants commission visibility right inside that ecosystem” GPT-6 Luna · Territory planning · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Spiff by Salesforce: Native Salesforce experience so reps see commissions where they already work | 50-500 reps” Muse Glimmer 30B · Commissions · direct prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“being especially careful with feature-rich but implementation-heavy platforms such as Varicent, CaptivateIQ, and some Spiff deployments” Perplexity Sonar · Commissions · negative prompt · soft negative
“G2 reviewers mention configuration and implementation challenges, dependence on clean Salesforce data, and sync or reporting issues.” GPT-6 Luna · Commissions · negative prompt · soft negative
“usually out of the question due to high minimum user counts, steep monthly platform fees, and expensive implementation costs” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Commissions · budget prompt · soft negative
“Users find Salesforce Spiff to be "expensive, particularly challenging for smaller sales teams with limited budgets."” Muse Glimmer 30B · Commissions · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 144 of the 147 answers that named Salesforce Spiff and are not a share of its labels.
651 of the 651 domain citations in answers naming Salesforce Spiff came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase
What Salesforce Spiff's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: salesforce.com/sales/incentive-compensation-management, salesforce.com/sales/resources/consensus-spiff, salesforce.com/sales/contact/request-spiff-demo, salesforce.com/sales/incentive-compensation-management/guide, salesforce.com/sales/incentive-compensation-management/pricing. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Salesforce Spiff's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Salesforce Spiff, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Salesforce Spiff by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: