Mid-market▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 32 → 9 of 116
2 categories · RankedPerformio
75Judge labels
5First choices
15Negative labels
13 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
6% in Commissions for enterprise buyers
Rank 9 of 123 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 9 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Performio →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market9 of 123
2%9 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise66 of 92
0%1 label
under the label threshold
In territory planning · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Performio for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Territory and quota planning | Revenue operations | 2% | 9 of 123 | 0% | 9 | under 10 labels · led by CaptivateIQ Planning at 36% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Sales commissions and incentive compensation | Revenue operations | 2% | 10 of 47 | 15% | 27 | accepted challenger | ▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Performio held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Territory planning · by segment
EnterprisenewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 56 of 83, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Commissions | 4% | 0% | ▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 7 → 10 of 47 |
| Territory planning | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 32 → 9 of 123 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Performio across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Performio across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct8 labelsNone
Paraphrase20 labels2
Comparative20 labelsNone
Budget-constrained6 labels2
Scale-constrained10 labels1
Negative11 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative75 labels in all, every segment counted; 5 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Everstage and Performio are top recommendations” Mistral Small · Territory planning · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Performio is the most balanced pick” Muse Glimmer 30B · Commissions · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Performio - A user-friendly commission tracking platform... best for mid-market and enterprise companies automating commission processes.” Llama 4 Maverick · Territory planning · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Best For: Mid-market companies with highly complex, global, or multi-currency compensation structures.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Commissions · direct prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Weak spots include an interface that feels dated, slow page loads with large datasets, occasional sync delays” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Commissions · negative prompt · soft negative
“Enterprise tools like CaptivateIQ or Performio use custom (often high) pricing” Grok 4.20 · Commissions · budget prompt · soft negative
“Who should avoid: Teams that need real-time commission visibility.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Commissions · negative prompt · soft negative
“limited modeling capabilities relative to full ICM platforms” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Commissions · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Performio, over the 75 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Performio was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Performio, over the 75 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Performio was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Performio. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 75 of the 75 answers that named Performio and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
everstage.com56
captivateiq.com53
qobra.co51
g2.com36
guideflow.com35
forma.ai34
quotapath.com31
learn.g2.com30
performio.coYour site27
technologyadvice.com25
351 of the 378 domain citations in answers naming Performio came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
performio.co is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Performio takes 2% of first choices and CaptivateIQ Planning takes 36%.ShowHide
Search and answers
performio.co is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Performio takes 2% of first choices and CaptivateIQ Planning takes 36%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “sales territory and quota planning tool”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best sales territory and quota planning tool”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 720 a month (“performio”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 5 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 2,271 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 840 · 26 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 864
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 9 of 123 in territory planning
Segment leader
36%
CaptivateIQ Planning
- First choices
- 5 across its categories
- Named in
- 75 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 75 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on performio.co
292
subdomains included
Content
240
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
8 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 151 | 6 | 2026-09-25 | ||
| Report or ebook | 28 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 20 | 0 | 2026-03-17 | ||
| Case study | 19 | undated | |||
| News or press | 16 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 4 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 1 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-25Best sales incentive software blog
- 2026-08-25Ai contextual maturity icm software blog
- 2026-08-25Best sales compensation software blog
- 2026-08-18Best sales commission software blog
- 2026-08-06Best commission tracking software blog
- 2026-07-30Commission plan blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page performio.co exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Performio
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Performio is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Performio is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Sales commission and incentive compensation software to manage commission plans, calculations, payouts, and reporting in one platform.
- For
- Finance professionals; Sales operations professionals; Compensation professionals
- Price stated
- Flexible pricing designed around your team, plans, and level of complexity—with no unnecessary add-ons. Pricing is based on team size and implementation scope. Subscription pricing scales with participants and selected capabilities, while implementation is a one-time cost. performio.co/pricing
- Customers named
- DragercoeoUber FreightService ExpressAVEVAWP EngineREA GroupFujifilm
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting
What Performio's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: performio.co, performio.co/pricing, performio.co/capabilities/ai, performio.co/customers, performio.co/capabilities/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Performio's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Performio, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Performio by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Performio is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Performio, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.