Two of fourteen models named Qobra first on the direct prompt; one named Xactly Incent. Qobra was named by nine of the fourteen models and Xactly Incent by fourteen and Qobra carries 24 labels and Xactly Incent 46, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in three categories this edition.
By Xactly Corporation, San Jose, United States, founded 2005. Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the sales commissions and incentive compensation page.
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Qobra and Xactly Incent were named in the same answer thirty-eight times, of the 72 answers naming Qobra and the 142 naming Xactly Incent. In those answers Xactly Incent took the first choice five times and Qobra six.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“Qobra leads in implementation speed (7-14 days) and sales rep adoption (95%+), making it ideal for growth-stage B2B companies” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · first choice
“is likely to be one of the following options: 1. Qobra” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend starting with Qobra or Everstage” GLM 4.7 FlashX · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“outdated interface that can feel clunky and unintuitive, with inadequate and cumbersome reporting features ... implementation is long and expensive” Claude Haiku 4.5 · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid older legacy tools like Xactly unless you have specific enterprise requirements.” Kimi K2 · direct prompt · hard negative
“Legacy technology issues: Users report clunky, confusing interfaces and slow loading times ... Despite these issues, it has decent overall ratings (4.2/5)” MiniMax M2.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Visdum and Xactly Incent are top choices due to their automation, integration, and scalability.” Mistral Small · direct prompt · first choice
“For most mid-sized B2B companies, Xactly and Varicent are the top choices” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“For large, complex sales organizations: Xactly or Beqom” GLM 4.7 FlashX · comparative prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.