Four of fourteen models named CaptivateIQ first on the direct prompt; two named Qobra. CaptivateIQ was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Qobra by nine and CaptivateIQ carries 57 labels and Qobra 24, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in two categories this edition.
Named in three categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the sales commissions and incentive compensation page.
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, CaptivateIQ and Qobra were named in the same answer forty-two times, of the 158 answers naming CaptivateIQ and the 72 naming Qobra. In those answers Qobra took the first choice four times and CaptivateIQ seven.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.20 | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“usually out of the question due to high minimum user counts, steep monthly platform fees, and expensive implementation costs” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · soft negative
“steeper learning curve than no-code alternatives, premium pricing (often 2-3x competitors for similar team sizes)” Claude Haiku 4.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“CaptivateIQ (G2: ~4.7/5, but notable cons): - Issues: Steep learning curve for reporting/customization” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · soft negative
“points to CaptivateIQ and Everstage as the top choices due to their balance of flexibility, implementation speed, and modern usability.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“CaptivateIQ - A flexible ICM platform that centralizes incentive plan design, participant management, and payout calculation in one workflow.” Llama 4 Maverick · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“If you want a platform that offers the best balance of flexibility, finance control, and scalability, shortlist CaptivateIQ.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“Qobra leads in implementation speed (7-14 days) and sales rep adoption (95%+), making it ideal for growth-stage B2B companies” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · first choice
“is likely to be one of the following options: 1. Qobra” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend starting with Qobra or Everstage” GLM 4.7 FlashX · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.