AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Revenue operations › Commissions › CaptivateIQ vs Commissionly
Sales commissions and incentive compensation · October 2026 Edition

CaptivateIQ vs Commissionly

Four of fourteen models named CaptivateIQ first on the direct prompt; zero named Commissionly. CaptivateIQ was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Commissionly by ten and CaptivateIQ carries 57 labels and Commissionly 12, so the shares are not directly comparable.

CaptivateIQ

accepted challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

Commissionly

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share25%10%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate18%17%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#4A position in a field of 10; printed, not drawn.
Labels5712A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, CaptivateIQ reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Everstage was named alongside these two in ten of the fourteen direct answers. CaptivateIQ vs Everstage · CaptivateIQ vs QuotaPath · CaptivateIQ vs Qobra

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the sales commissions and incentive compensation page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
CaptivateIQFirst choices, of fourteen modelsCommissionly
Direct40
Paraphrase80
Comparative30
Budget-constrained063 against CaptivateIQ
Scale-constrained30
Negative207 against CaptivateIQ · 2 against Commissionly
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, CaptivateIQ and Commissionly were named in the same answer twenty-seven times, of the 158 answers naming CaptivateIQ and the 55 naming Commissionly. In those answers Commissionly took the first choice seven times and CaptivateIQ zero.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where CaptivateIQ and Commissionly stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
CaptivateIQ Commissionly first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, CaptivateIQ on the left and Commissionly on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where CaptivateIQ and Commissionly stood in it.

CaptivateIQ first, Commissionly not the choice

4 of 14 modelsCommissionly was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Claude Haiku 4.5CaptivateIQ, Qobra alternatives: EasyComp, Everstage, Visdum
GPT-5.4 miniCaptivateIQ, Everstage alternatives: Salesforce Spiff, Xactly Incent
Gemini 3.5 FlashCaptivateIQ alternatives: Everstage, Performio, QuotaPath, Salesforce Spiff
Qwen 3.7 FlashCaptivateIQ, Everstage

Neither was the first choice, one was named

8 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Perplexity SonarQuotaPath alternatives: CaptivateIQ, Performio, Qobra
Grok 4.20Everstage, Qobra alternatives: CaptivateIQ, Salesforce Spiff, Visdum
Mistral SmallVisdum, Xactly Incent alternatives: CaptivateIQ, Forma.ai, QuotaPath
Kimi K2Everstage, Visdum alternatives: CaptivateIQ, QuotaPath
GLM 4.7 FlashXQuotaPath alternatives: CaptivateIQ, Everstage, Performio, Qobra
MiniMax M2.5Visdum alternatives: CaptivateIQ
GPT-6 LunaEverstage alternatives: CaptivateIQ, Salesforce Spiff
Muse Glimmer 30BQuotaPath alternatives: CaptivateIQ, Everstage, Qobra, Salesforce Spiff

Neither was named

2 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
DeepSeek V4 FlashEverstage, QuotaPath alternatives: Performio, Qobra
Llama 4 MaverickQuotaPath

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Commissionly leads by seventeen points.
Commissionly17%#3 of 11
CaptivateIQ0%#9 of 11
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
The order flips: CaptivateIQ leads at mid-market.
CaptivateIQ25%#1 of 10
Commissionly10%#4 of 10
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
CaptivateIQ leads by twenty-four points.
CaptivateIQ24%#2 of 11
Commissionly0%#– of 11
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about CaptivateIQ

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.

“usually out of the question due to high minimum user counts, steep monthly platform fees, and expensive implementation costs” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · soft negative
“steeper learning curve than no-code alternatives, premium pricing (often 2-3x competitors for similar team sizes)” Claude Haiku 4.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“CaptivateIQ (G2: ~4.7/5, but notable cons): - Issues: Steep learning curve for reporting/customization” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · soft negative
“points to CaptivateIQ and Everstage as the top choices due to their balance of flexibility, implementation speed, and modern usability.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“CaptivateIQ - A flexible ICM platform that centralizes incentive plan design, participant management, and payout calculation in one workflow.” Llama 4 Maverick · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“If you want a platform that offers the best balance of flexibility, finance control, and scalability, shortlist CaptivateIQ.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice

What the models said about Commissionly

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.

“Who should avoid: Companies with complex commission plans or those needing deep custom reporting.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“may not be suitable for larger teams or those with complex commission structures” Mistral Small · negative prompt · soft negative
“Commissionly and Sales Cookie are the top recommendations due to their low cost and simplicity” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice
“Commissionly is the most frequently recommended budget-friendly choice in 2025-2026 round-ups” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · first choice
“For a company with a limited budget, I'd recommend starting with Commissionly or Sales Cookie.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.