AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Revenue operations › Commissions › QuotaPath vs Commissionly
Sales commissions and incentive compensation · October 2026 Edition

QuotaPath vs Commissionly

Five of fourteen models named QuotaPath first on the direct prompt; zero named Commissionly. QuotaPath was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Commissionly by ten and QuotaPath carries 48 labels and Commissionly 12, so the shares are not directly comparable.

QuotaPath

accepted challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

Commissionly

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share15%10%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate10%17%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#3#4A position in a field of 10; printed, not drawn.
Labels4812A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, QuotaPath reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.CaptivateIQ was named alongside these two in twelve of the fourteen direct answers. CaptivateIQ vs QuotaPath · CaptivateIQ vs Commissionly · Everstage vs QuotaPath

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the sales commissions and incentive compensation page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
QuotaPathFirst choices, of fourteen modelsCommissionly
Direct50
Paraphrase10
Comparative20
Budget-constrained364 against QuotaPath
Scale-constrained00
Negative001 against QuotaPath · 2 against Commissionly
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, QuotaPath and Commissionly were named in the same answer forty-nine times, of the 179 answers naming QuotaPath and the 55 naming Commissionly. In those answers Commissionly took the first choice fifteen times and QuotaPath nineteen.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where QuotaPath and Commissionly stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
QuotaPath Commissionly first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, QuotaPath on the left and Commissionly on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where QuotaPath and Commissionly stood in it.

QuotaPath first, Commissionly not the choice

5 of 14 modelsCommissionly was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Perplexity SonarQuotaPath alternatives: CaptivateIQ, Performio, Qobra
DeepSeek V4 FlashEverstage, QuotaPath alternatives: Performio, Qobra
Llama 4 MaverickQuotaPath
GLM 4.7 FlashXQuotaPath alternatives: CaptivateIQ, Everstage, Performio, Qobra
Muse Glimmer 30BQuotaPath alternatives: CaptivateIQ, Everstage, Qobra, Salesforce Spiff

Neither was the first choice, one was named

3 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Gemini 3.5 FlashCaptivateIQ alternatives: Everstage, Performio, QuotaPath, Salesforce Spiff
Mistral SmallVisdum, Xactly Incent alternatives: CaptivateIQ, Forma.ai, QuotaPath
Kimi K2Everstage, Visdum alternatives: CaptivateIQ, QuotaPath

Neither was named

6 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5CaptivateIQ, Qobra alternatives: EasyComp, Everstage, Visdum
GPT-5.4 miniCaptivateIQ, Everstage alternatives: Salesforce Spiff, Xactly Incent
Grok 4.1 FastEverstage, Qobra alternatives: CaptivateIQ, Salesforce Spiff, Visdum
Qwen 3.7 FlashCaptivateIQ, Everstage
MiniMax M2.5Visdum alternatives: CaptivateIQ
GPT-6 LunaEverstage alternatives: CaptivateIQ, Salesforce Spiff

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
QuotaPath leads by thirty points.
QuotaPath47%#1 of 11
Commissionly17%#3 of 11
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
QuotaPath leads by five points.
QuotaPath15%#3 of 10
Commissionly10%#4 of 10
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
QuotaPath leads by four points.
QuotaPath4%#7 of 11
Commissionly0%#– of 11
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about QuotaPath

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.

“Avoid QuotaPath if you have fewer than ~15 users, since the $525/month platform fee makes the total cost disproportionately high” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“QuotaPath Growth is $35 per user per month + $525 monthly platform fee, which is overkill for a very limited budget” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · soft negative
“its current Growth plan lists a $525/month platform fee, billed annually, so I wouldn't call it the budget pick” GPT-6 Luna · budget prompt · soft negative
“QuotaPath — best for SMB and mid-market revenue teams that want faster setup, transparent pricing, and straightforward commission automation.” GPT-5.4 mini · comparative prompt · first choice
“If you want one name most 2026 guides cite as the default mid-market pick, it’s QuotaPath for transparency and speed” Muse Glimmer 30B · direct prompt · first choice
“QuotaPath stands out as one of the strongest options among sales commission management platforms” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · first choice

What the models said about Commissionly

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.

“Who should avoid: Companies with complex commission plans or those needing deep custom reporting.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“may not be suitable for larger teams or those with complex commission structures” Mistral Small · negative prompt · soft negative
“Commissionly and Sales Cookie are the top recommendations due to their low cost and simplicity” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice
“Commissionly is the most frequently recommended budget-friendly choice in 2025-2026 round-ups” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · first choice
“For a company with a limited budget, I'd recommend starting with Commissionly or Sales Cookie.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.