Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 112 → 94 of 94
1 category · RankedAnaplan Territory & Quota Planning
137Judge labels
20First choices
58Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
32% in Territory planning for enterprise buyers
Rank 17 of 123 in the mid-market standingcriticized challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 41% of its 46 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Anaplan Territory & Quota Planning →By buyer segmentAn enterprise product: leader at enterprise, not named at small business.
Small business103 of 103
0%32 labels
criticized challenger
Mid-market17 of 123
2%46 labels
criticized challenger
Enterprise1 of 92
32%59 labels
endorsed leader
In territory planning · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Anaplan Territory & Quota Planning for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Territory and quota planning | Revenue operations | 2% | 17 of 123 | 41% | 46 | criticized challenger | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Anaplan Territory & Quota Planning held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Territory planning · by segment
Mid-market▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 86 → 16 of 116
Enterprise▲+1Since September 2026: 33% → 35%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
35%from 33% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 2 → 1 of 83
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Territory planning | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 86 → 17 of 123 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Anaplan Territory & Quota Planning across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Anaplan Territory & Quota Planning across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 6 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct28 labels10
Paraphrase6 labelsNone
Comparative31 labels16not counted in share
Budget-constrained20 labels5
Scale-constrained25 labels5
Negative27 labels2not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative137 labels in all, every segment counted; 20 of the 38 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“look for solutions that balance enterprise-grade capabilities with mid-market agility - tools like Anaplan, Oracle SPM, or dedicated sales planning platforms” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Territory planning · scale prompt · first choice
“For enterprise-wide simulation connecting territory, headcount, and finance, Anaplan remains the dominant heavyweight solution.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Territory planning · comparative prompt · first choice
“Anaplan and Pipeline (ZoomInfo) are the most comprehensive, integrating territory design, quota setting, and capacity modeling.” Mistral Small · Territory planning · comparative prompt · first choice
“Varicent and Anaplan are the strongest matches based on the results provided” Perplexity Sonar · Territory planning · comparative prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Avoid Anaplan unless you have a dedicated, permanent budget for certified Anaplan Model Builders or consultants to manage it.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Territory planning · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid buying enterprise planning platforms (like Anaplan or large SPM suites) if you have fewer than 30–50 reps.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Territory planning · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid "Enterprise" giants (like Anaplan) which require massive implementation” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Territory planning · scale prompt · hard negative
“Custom enterprise pricing, often $100K+ per year. Overkill for SMBs.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Territory planning · budget prompt · hard negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Anaplan Territory & Quota Planning, over the 137 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Anaplan Territory & Quota Planning was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Anaplan Territory & Quota Planning, over the 137 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Anaplan Territory & Quota Planning was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Anaplan Territory & Quota Planning. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 132 of the 137 answers that named Anaplan Territory & Quota Planning and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
captivateiq.com100
guideflow.com90
pipeline.zoominfo.com83
varicent.com58
prospeo.io49
gitnux.org45
learn.g2.com45
worldmetrics.org41
anaplan.comYour site35
lative.ai34
545 of the 580 domain citations in answers naming Anaplan Territory & Quota Planning came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
anaplan.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Anaplan Territory & Quota Planning takes 2% of first choices and CaptivateIQ Planning takes 36%.ShowHide
Search and answers
anaplan.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Anaplan Territory & Quota Planning takes 2% of first choices and CaptivateIQ Planning takes 36%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “sales territory and quota planning tool”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best sales territory and quota planning tool”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- not counted (“anaplan territory & quota planning”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 78,179 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 5,470 · 815 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 5,421
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 17 of 123 in territory planning
Segment leader
36%
CaptivateIQ Planning
- First choices
- 20 across its categories
- Named in
- 137 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 132 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on anaplan.com
5,353
subdomains included
Content
1,984
counted in the table below
Documentation
3,129
Product · Integration
126 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 732 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 643 | undated | Territory planning | ||
| Report or ebook | 204 | undated | Territory planning | ||
| Case study | 196 | undated | |||
| News or press | 167 | 1 | 2026-09-23 | ||
| Podcast or video | 14 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 13 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 12 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 2 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-23Blue owl executive perspectives future enterprise software anaplan news or press
- 2026-06-03How bazookas cio is bringing ai to the gum game and navigating candy industry headwinds news or press
- 2026-05-18Ai enterprise software deterministic domain authority saas split news or press
- 2026-05-12Bazookas big pop transitioning legacy systems predictive analytics news or press
- 2026-02-02Coworking with jim freeze news or press
- 2026-01-20Jim freeze anaplan proving marketings impact news or press
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page anaplan.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Anaplan Territory & Quota Planning
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Anaplan Territory & Quota Planning; a claim can dispute any of them.
Anaplan 45Anaplan (Sales Territory & Quota Planning) 1
Follow Anaplan Territory & Quota Planning
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Anaplan is the company behind Anaplan Territory & Quota Planning.ShowHide
The company
Anaplan is the company behind Anaplan Territory & Quota Planning.
ShowHideOn record
Wikidata- Website
- anaplan.com
- Headquarters
- San Francisco, United States
- Founded
- 2006
- Ownership
- Public, PLAN on New York Stock Exchange
Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · Crunchbase
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Accelerate time to value with Anaplan Territory and Quota Planning
- For
- sales and sales operations leaders
- Certifications
- SOC 1 Type 2, SOC 2 Type 2ISO-27001, 27017, 27018, 27701, & 42001CSA Trusted Cloud ProviderCSA STAR Level 1Cyber EssentialsENS (Esquema Nacional de Seguridad)APEC CBPRsTRUSTe International Privacy Verified
- Customers named
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting
What Anaplan Territory & Quota Planning's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: anaplan.com/applications/territory-and-quota-planning-app, anaplan.com, trust.anaplan.com, anaplan.com/platform, anaplan.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Anaplan Territory & Quota Planning's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Anaplan Territory & Quota Planning, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Anaplan Territory & Quota Planning by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Anaplan Territory & Quota Planning is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Anaplan Territory & Quota Planning, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.