Every category where a model named Fullcast for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Territory and quota planning	Revenue operations	18%	2 of 103	6%	33	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Fullcast yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Fullcast across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	2	0	0	2
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	2	1	0	0	3
Perplexity Sonar	1	1	1	0	3
Grok 4.1 Fast	2	2	0	0	4
Mistral Small	1	2	0	0	3
DeepSeek V4 Flash	2	2	0	1	5
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	1	0	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	0	1
Kimi K2	2	1	0	1	4
GLM 4.7 FlashX	2	0	1	0	3
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	2	0	3

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct24 labels8

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative29 labels3not counted in share

Budget-constrained8 labelsNone

Scale-constrained18 labels4

Negative11 labels3not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative90 labels in all, every segment counted; 12 of the 18 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“the strongest overall fit is usually Fullcast if you need territory planning and quota planning together in one RevOps workflow” Perplexity Sonar · Territory planning · direct prompt · first choice

“For most mid-market B2B companies using Salesforce, Fullcast is the most purpose-built and operationally impactful choice.” Kimi K2 · Territory planning · direct prompt · first choice

“Fullcast is the industry standard... handles the daily routing, carving, and Salesforce sync better than any other tool” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Territory planning · direct prompt · first choice

“Highly Recommended): Examples: Pigment, Fullcast, or Abacum... sit perfectly in the mid-market to upper mid-market space” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Territory planning · scale prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Mid-market RevOps tools (~$20K+/year or $2,400+/user/year).” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Territory planning · budget prompt · hard negative

“start at $20K–$60K/year — likely out of budget range” Kimi K2 · Territory planning · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Fullcast, over the 90 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Fullcast was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Anaplan73 of 9013Not in the top three

Varicent67 of 9011Not in the top three

CaptivateIQ63 of 9011Compare →

eSpatial46 of 902Not in the top three

Maptive38 of 901Not in the top three

Salesforce Maps38 of 900Not in the top three

Xactly33 of 900Not in the top three

QuotaPath27 of 903Compare →

Badger Maps25 of 904Not in the top three

Workday Adaptive Planning22 of 901Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Fullcast. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 16 of the 90 answers that named Fullcast and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

captivateiq.com15

pipeline.zoominfo.com15

guideflow.com14

articsledge.com11

bitscale.ai10

worldmetrics.org10

salesmotion.io9

maptive.com7

zipdo.co6

gitnux.org5

102 of the 102 domain citations in answers naming Fullcast came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

captivateiq.com/blog/territory-planning-software-202615

pipeline.zoominfo.com/sales/sales-territory-management-software15

articsledge.com/post/territory-planning-software10

bitscale.ai/blogs/best-territory-planning-tools10

guideflow.com/blog/sales-territory-management-software9

worldmetrics.org/best/territory-planning-software8

maptive.com/15-best-sales-territory-mapping-software7

salesmotion.io/blog/sales-territory-mapping-software7

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Fullcast's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Fullcast, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at fullcast.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.