Small business=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 17 → 11 of 94
1 category · RankedFullcast
76Judge labels
5First choices
15Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
4% in Territory planning for small business buyers
Rank 4 of 123 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
1 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 8% of its 24 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Fullcast →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business10 of 103
4%25 labels
criticized challenger
Mid-market4 of 123
4%24 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise9 of 92
2%27 labels
accepted challenger
In territory planning · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Fullcast for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Territory and quota planning | Revenue operations | 4% | 4 of 123 | 8% | 24 | accepted challenger | ▼−14Since September 2026: 18% → 4%, −14 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Fullcast moved past the floor in its one category, Territory planning, −14 points to 4%.
Best category · Territory planning · by segment
Mid-market▼−14Since September 2026: 18% → 4%, −14 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.
4%from 18% in September 2026
Cleared the floor by 3 pointsRank 2 → 4 of 116
Enterprise▼−2Since September 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 4% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 4 → 8 of 83
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Territory planning | 18% | 4% | ▼−14Since September 2026: 18% → 4%, −14 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked. | Moved past the floor | Rank 2 → 4 of 123 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Fullcast across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Fullcast across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.20 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct18 labels2
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative19 labels2not counted in share
Budget-constrained7 labelsNone
Scale-constrained15 labels3
Negative17 labels5not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative76 labels in all, every segment counted; 5 of the 12 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“the research suggests a dedicated territory engine (like Fullcast, BoogieBoard, or similar) paired with clean data may be a better fit” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Territory planning · negative prompt · first choice
“Fullcast stands out for AI‑driven territory design and native Salesforce plan‑to‑pay integration.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Territory planning · comparative prompt · first choice
“Prioritize tools with quota-territory linkage (e.g., Fullcast for mid-market, Anaplan for enterprise)” Grok 4.20 · Territory planning · negative prompt · first choice
“Need continuous territory changes in Salesforce? → Look at Fullcast” Kimi K2 · Territory planning · negative prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“$20K–$60K/year. Not budget-friendly.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Territory planning · budget prompt · hard negative
“Dedicated tools like Fullcast or Anaplan are powerful but start at custom quotes often >$10k/year—unsuitable for limited budgets.” Grok 4.20 · Territory planning · budget prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Fullcast, over the 76 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Fullcast was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Fullcast, over the 76 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Fullcast was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Fullcast. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 76 of the 76 answers that named Fullcast and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
captivateiq.com62
guideflow.com61
pipeline.zoominfo.com57
prospeo.io40
gitnux.org33
varicent.com32
worldmetrics.org29
articsledge.com26
learn.g2.com23
lative.ai21
384 of the 384 domain citations in answers naming Fullcast came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
fullcast.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Fullcast takes 4% of first choices and CaptivateIQ Planning takes 36%.ShowHide
Search and answers
fullcast.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Fullcast takes 4% of first choices and CaptivateIQ Planning takes 36%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “sales territory and quota planning tool”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best sales territory and quota planning tool”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 6,600 a month (“fullcast”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 42 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 3,584 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 997 · 22 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,225
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
4%
rank 4 of 123 in territory planning
Segment leader
36%
CaptivateIQ Planning
- First choices
- 5 across its categories
- Named in
- 76 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 76 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on fullcast.com
1,820
subdomains included
Content
319
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
1 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Podcast or video | 104 | 13 | 2026-09-24 | CRM | |
| Conference or event | 57 | 1 | 2026-08-05 | ||
| Comparison | 53 | 3 | 2026-09-23 | CRM, ABM | |
| Report or ebook | 34 | 1 | 2026-07-18 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 28 | 4 | 2026-09-14 | CRM, SEO | |
| Case study | 17 | 3 | 2026-09-15 | ||
| Blog | 13 | 1 | 2026-07-09 | ||
| Template or tool | 7 | 1 | 2026-09-25 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 3 | 0 | 2025-11-14 | ||
| News or press | 3 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-25Sales planning diagnostic checklist 15 questions to assess your revenue planning maturity template or tool
- 2026-09-24Cory coult podcast or video
- 2026-09-23Revenue vs revenue action orchestration whats the difference comparison
- 2026-09-17Mark hartmann podcast or video
- 2026-09-15Rankings io case study
- 2026-09-14What is opportunity scoring a complete guide to prioritizing revenue opportunities glossary or explainer
Events in person
Last twelve months
- reported June 2026Gartner CSO and Sales Leader ConferenceLas Vegas · attended
- May 6, 2026 to May 7, 2026RevOps AF 2026San Francisco · attended
- May 4, 2026Charity Poker Supporting The Lombardo Legacy FundWynn Poker Room, Las Vegas, US · hosted
As the event pages on fullcast.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page fullcast.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Fullcast
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Fullcast; a claim can dispute any of them.
Fullcast / Clari Align 1
Follow Fullcast
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Fullcast is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Fullcast is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- One Connected System, From Plan to Pay
- For
- revenue teams
- Certifications
- SOC 2 Type IIGDPRUS Privacy Laws
- Customers named
- Albertsons Companies LLCAmpléo GroupAffiniPay LLCIn-SituCopadoSBR ConsultingDegreedSprout Social
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting
What Fullcast's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: fullcast.com, trust.fullcast.com, fullcast.com/content-type/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Fullcast's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Fullcast, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Fullcast by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Fullcast is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Fullcast, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.