Every category where a model named Salesforce Sales Planning for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Territory and quota planning	Revenue operations	0%	29 of 103	25%	8	under 10 labels · led by CaptivateIQ at 30%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Salesforce Sales Planning yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Salesforce Sales Planning across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	2	0	0	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	2	0	0	2
Mistral Small	0	0	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct6 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative3 labelsNone

Budget-constrained9 labels4

Scale-constrained7 labels1

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative27 labels in all, every segment counted; 5 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“CRM-Native Planning: Examples: Salesforce Sales Planning (formerly part of Territory Planning)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Territory planning · scale prompt · alternative

“Best for Geographic & Field Sales Teams: Salesforce Maps & Sales Planning” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Territory planning · direct prompt · alternative

“Salesforce Maps/Planning for seamless CRM integration without new tools.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Territory planning · direct prompt · alternative

“Salesforce Maps/Sales Planning (if you're in Salesforce)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Territory planning · scale prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“their territory planning module has shown concerning instability with recent updates. Proceed only if you have dedicated Salesforce support” Mistral Small · Territory planning · negative prompt · soft negative

“A constant stream of known bugs and patches” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Territory planning · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Salesforce Sales Planning, over the 27 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Salesforce Sales Planning was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Anaplan20 of 277Not in the top three

Varicent19 of 272Not in the top three

Fullcast18 of 273Not in the top three

CaptivateIQ16 of 273Not in the top three

eSpatial14 of 271Not in the top three

Salesforce Maps14 of 270Not in the top three

Maptive11 of 271Not in the top three

Xactly8 of 270Not in the top three

QuotaPath6 of 270Not in the top three

Workday Adaptive Planning6 of 270Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Salesforce Sales Planning. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 27 answers that named Salesforce Sales Planning and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

articsledge.com2

bitscale.ai2

boogieboard.ai2

captivateiq.com2

gitnux.org2

guideflow.com2

lative.ai2

pipeline.zoominfo.com2

salesmotion.io2

worldmetrics.org2

Twenty of the twenty domain citations in answers naming Salesforce Sales Planning came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

articsledge.com/post/territory-planning-software2

bitscale.ai/blogs/best-territory-planning-tools2

captivateiq.com/blog/territory-planning-software-20262

gitnux.org/best/sales-territory-design-software2

gitnux.org/best/sales-territory-planning-software2

gitnux.org/best/territory-planning-software2

guideflow.com/blog/sales-territory-management-software2

guideflow.com/blog/territory-planning-software2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Salesforce Sales Planning

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Salesforce Sales Planning; a claim can dispute any of them.

Salesforce Maps & Sales Planning 1Salesforce Maps + Sales Planning 1Salesforce Maps and Sales Planning 1Salesforce Maps/Sales Planning 1Salesforce Territory Planning 1Salesforce Territory Planning (Salesforce Maps) 1

The company

Salesforce is the company behind Salesforce Sales Planning.

Website: salesforce.com
Headquarters: San Francisco, United States
Founded: 1999
Employees: about 35,000 (2019)
Ownership: Public, CRM on New York Stock Exchange

From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Salesforce Sales Planning's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Salesforce Sales Planning, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at salesforce.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.