Every category where a model named Maptive for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Territory and quota planning	Revenue operations	2%	10 of 103	5%	21	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Maptive yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Maptive across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	0	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	0	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	2	0	3
Mistral Small	0	1	1	0	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	2	0	1	3
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	2	0	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	3	0	0	3
Kimi K2	0	0	2	0	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	2	0	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct11 labels1

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative18 labels3not counted in share

Budget-constrained15 labels1

Scale-constrained7 labels1

Negative10 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative61 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 6 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Maptive is best for teams that want every mapping feature included at a flat per-user price” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Territory planning · budget prompt · first choice

“"We just need to draw clean maps and visualize coverage" → eSpatial, Maptive, or Salesforce Maps” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Territory planning · comparative prompt · alternative

“eSpatial, Maptive | Excellent for algorithmic balancing and deep GIS visualization.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Territory planning · scale prompt · alternative

“tools like eSpatial or Maptive for visual mapping integrations” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Territory planning · negative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Mapping-first tools with algorithmic territory balancing at lower cost, but no quota or capacity planning” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Territory planning · direct prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Maptive, over the 61 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Maptive was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

eSpatial48 of 612Not in the top three

Anaplan40 of 616Not in the top three

CaptivateIQ39 of 617Not in the top three

Fullcast38 of 616Not in the top three

Varicent34 of 613Not in the top three

Salesforce Maps33 of 610Not in the top three

Badger Maps27 of 614Not in the top three

MapBusinessOnline22 of 613Not in the top three

QuotaPath18 of 613Not in the top three

Xactly15 of 610Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Maptive. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 6 of the 61 answers that named Maptive and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

captivateiq.com6

guideflow.com6

pipeline.zoominfo.com6

maptive.comYour site4

salesmotion.io4

articsledge.com3

bitscale.ai3

worldmetrics.org3

cleverly.co2

espatial.com2

Thirty-five of the thirty-nine domain citations in answers naming Maptive came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

captivateiq.com/blog/territory-planning-software-20266

pipeline.zoominfo.com/sales/sales-territory-management-software6

maptive.com/15-best-sales-territory-mapping-software4

articsledge.com/post/territory-planning-software3

bitscale.ai/blogs/best-territory-planning-tools3

captivateiq.com/blog/sales-quota-management-software3

guideflow.com/blog/best-sales-planning-software3

guideflow.com/blog/sales-territory-management-software3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Maptive

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Maptive; a claim can dispute any of them.

eSpatial / Maptive / Geopointe 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Maptive's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Maptive, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at maptive.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.