Small business▼−2Since September 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 4% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 6 → 8 of 94
2 categories · RankedMaptive
41Judge labels
5First choices
4Negative labels
11 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
6% in Territory planning for mid-market buyers
Rank 3 of 123 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 18% of its 11 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Maptive →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business11 of 103
2%21 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market3 of 123
6%11 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise11 of 92
2%8 labels
under the label threshold
In territory planning · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Maptive for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Territory and quota planning | Revenue operations | 6% | 3 of 123 | 18% | 11 | accepted challenger | ▲+4Since September 2026: 2% → 6%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Field sales tools | Sales | 0% | 70 of 94 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Badger Maps at 38% |
Movement
Since September 2026, Maptive held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Territory planning · by segment
Mid-market▲+4Since September 2026: 2% → 6%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
6%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 7 pointsRank 9 → 3 of 116
Enterprise▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 69 → 12 of 83
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Territory planning | 2% | 6% | ▲+4Since September 2026: 2% → 6%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 9 → 3 of 123 |
| Field sales | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 70 of 94, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Maptive across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Maptive across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.20 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct6 labels1
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative12 labels2not counted in share
Budget-constrained11 labels4
Scale-constrained3 labelsNone
Negative9 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative41 labels in all, every segment counted; 5 of the 8 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Maptive stands out as one of the best affordable sales territory and quota planning tools” Grok 4.20 · Territory planning · budget prompt · first choice
“Top Recommendation: Maptive (Best overall for limited budgets)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Territory planning · budget prompt · first choice
“Top Recommendation: Maptive” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Territory planning · budget prompt · first choice
“Maptive — highlighted for mapping plus analytics, with entry pricing noted at $29/month” Perplexity Sonar · Territory planning · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“When to Avoid: If your sales structure is based on industry verticals, company size, or intent data rather than geography.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Territory planning · negative prompt · soft negative
“good for basic mapping but limited in complex territory balancing and quota workflows” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Territory planning · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Maptive, over the 41 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Maptive was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Maptive, over the 41 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Maptive was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Maptive. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 41 of the 41 answers that named Maptive and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
guideflow.com35
captivateiq.com33
pipeline.zoominfo.com27
prospeo.io24
salesmotion.io20
gitnux.org19
espatial.com17
pickmysoft.com16
maptive.comYour site13
worldmetrics.org13
204 of the 217 domain citations in answers naming Maptive came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
maptive.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Maptive takes 6% of first choices and CaptivateIQ Planning takes 36%.ShowHide
Search and answers
maptive.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Maptive takes 6% of first choices and CaptivateIQ Planning takes 36%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “sales territory and quota planning tool”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best sales territory and quota planning tool”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 2,400 a month (“maptive”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 11 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 462,906 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 19,470 · 1,386 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 3,163
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
6%
rank 3 of 123 in territory planning
Segment leader
36%
CaptivateIQ Planning
- First choices
- 5 across its categories
- Named in
- 41 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 41 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on maptive.com
625
subdomains included
Content
371
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
108 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 310 | 23 | 2026-09-27 | CRM, BI & dashboards | |
| Comparison | 32 | 3 | 2026-09-14 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 16 | 1 | 2026-09-11 | ||
| Case study | 8 | 1 | 2026-07-10 | ||
| Template or tool | 4 | 1 | 2026-07-16 | ||
| Report or ebook | 1 | 0 | 2025-03-01 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-27Franchise unit consistency starts at signing blog
- 2026-09-26Franchise development pay unit survival blog
- 2026-09-25Planet fitness new franchisees what it signals blog
- 2026-09-17Franchise transfer approval credit decision blog
- 2026-09-16Franchise market selection support reach blog
- 2026-09-15Franchise failure paperwork regulator evidence blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page maptive.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Maptive
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Maptive; a claim can dispute any of them.
Maptive / eSpatial 1
Follow Maptive
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Maptive is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Maptive is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Online Mapping Software
- For
- business teams that need to work with location data without hiring a GIS analyst
- Price stated
- The 45 Day Pass is $250 for short projects, the Pro plan is $1,250 a year for one user, and the Team plan is $2,500 a year for five users. Larger organizations can ask about Enterprise pricing. maptive.com
- Starting price
- 250 maptive.com
- Free plan or trial
- You can try Maptive free for ten days, and you do not need to enter a credit card to start. maptive.com
- Integrations claimed
- 60 maptive.com/features
- Certifications
- passed Salesforce AppExchange security review
- Hosting
- USGBCA
- Customers named
- Indiana State UniversityThe Royal Bank of ScotlandRMSI Retail SolutionsSteelMaster BuildingsBRACEcotourism AustraliaOld Dominion UniversityKravet
What Maptive's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: maptive.com, maptive.com/pricing, trust.maptive.com, maptive.com/features. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Maptive's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Maptive, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Maptive by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Maptive is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Maptive, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where Maptive is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.ShowHide
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where Maptive is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.
ShowHideMaptive is among the products AI models recommend first in Territory and quota planning this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.