Territory and quota planning · October 2026 Edition
Maptive vs QuotaPath
Zero of fourteen models named Maptive first on the direct prompt; zero named QuotaPath. Maptive was named by eight of the fourteen models and QuotaPath by eight and Maptive carries 11 labels and QuotaPath 12, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in two categories this edition.
Named in two categories this edition.
First-choice share6%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate18%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#3#5A position in a field of 11; printed, not drawn.
Labels1112A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Maptive reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.CaptivateIQ Planning was named alongside these two in nine of the fourteen direct answers. CaptivateIQ Planning vs Maptive · CaptivateIQ Planning vs QuotaPath · Everstage vs Maptive
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the territory and quota planning page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
MaptiveFirst choices, of fourteen modelsQuotaPath
Direct00
Paraphrase00
Comparative00
Budget-constrained32
Scale-constrained00
Negative002 against Maptive
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Maptive and QuotaPath stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | |||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | |||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | ||||
| Mistral Small | | |||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | |||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | |||||
| Kimi K2 | | |||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | |||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | |||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | |
Maptive QuotaPath first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Maptive on the left and QuotaPath on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Maptive and QuotaPath stood in it.
Neither was the first choice, one was named
2 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Gemini 3.5 FlashFullcast alternatives: CaptivateIQ Planning, Lative, QuotaPath, Xactly AlignStar
GLM 4.7 FlashXCaptivateIQ Planning alternatives: Everstage, Fullcast, QuotaPath
Neither was named
12 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Claude Haiku 4.5CaptivateIQ Planning alternatives: BitScale, Fullcast, Salesforce Sales Planning, eSpatial
GPT-5.4 miniXactly alternatives: Anaplan Territory & Quota Planning, Fullcast
Perplexity SonarCaptivateIQ Planning alternatives: Fullcast, Pigment
Grok 4.1 FastCaptivateIQ Planning alternatives: Anaplan Territory & Quota Planning, Outreach, SAP Territory and Quota, Salesforce Maps, eSpatial
Mistral SmallPigment alternatives: Anaplan Territory & Quota Planning, Aviso
DeepSeek V4 FlashCaptivateIQ Planning alternatives: Fullcast, Vena
Llama 4 MaverickZoomInfo's Planning product alternatives: CaptivateIQ Planning, Guideflow, Prospeo
Qwen 3.7 FlashRepertoire AI alternatives: Clari Copilot
Kimi K2CaptivateIQ Planning alternatives: Varicent Territory and Quota Planning, eSpatial
MiniMax M2.5no first choice
GPT-6 LunaFullcast Plan alternatives: Salesforce Sales Planning / Territory Planning, Xactly
Muse Glimmer 30BCaptivateIQ Planning alternatives: Revcast, Vena
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
QuotaPath leads by twenty-two points.
QuotaPath24%#1 of 15Maptive2%#7 of 15Mid-marketThe figures above
The order flips: Maptive leads at mid-market.
Maptive6%#3 of 11QuotaPath4%#5 of 11Enterprise
Level: the same share of first choices.
Maptive2%#– of 9QuotaPath2%#– of 9What the models said about Maptive
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.
“When to Avoid: If your sales structure is based on industry verticals, company size, or intent data rather than geography.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“good for basic mapping but limited in complex territory balancing and quota workflows” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Maptive stands out as one of the best affordable sales territory and quota planning tools” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · first choice
“Top Recommendation: Maptive (Best overall for limited budgets)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“Top Recommendation: Maptive” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
What the models said about QuotaPath
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. One of one in this category shown.
“For the most cost-effective solution, QuotaPath offers the best value with transparent pricing and no hidden fees” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · first choice
Also compared
CaptivateIQ Planning vs MaptiveCaptivateIQ Planning vs QuotaPathEverstage vs MaptiveEverstage vs QuotaPathMaptive vs FullcastMaptive vs XactlyMaptive vs Salesforce Sales PlanningMaptive vs Anaplan Territory & Quota PlanningFullcast vs QuotaPathQuotaPath vs XactlyQuotaPath vs Salesforce Sales PlanningQuotaPath vs Anaplan Territory & Quota PlanningAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full territory planning standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.