GTM AI Index
Index › Revenue operations › Territory planning › Fullcast vs QuotaPath
Territory and quota planning · September 2026 Edition

Fullcast vs QuotaPath

Six of twelve models named Fullcast first on the direct prompt; one named QuotaPath. Fullcast was named by eleven of the twelve models and QuotaPath by eight and Fullcast carries 33 labels and QuotaPath 23, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Fullcast

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

QuotaPath

accepted challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

First-choice share18%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate6%4%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#2#3A position in a field of 11; printed, not drawn.
Labels3323A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Fullcast reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.CaptivateIQ was named alongside these two in seven of the twelve direct answers. CaptivateIQ vs Fullcast · CaptivateIQ vs QuotaPath

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the territory and quota planning page.

By framing

How many of the twelve models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
FullcastFirst choices, of twelve modelsQuotaPath
Direct611 against QuotaPath
Paraphrase01
Comparative20
Budget-constrained002 against Fullcast
Scale-constrained30
Negative10
Bars are first choices, 0 to 12 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to twelve.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Fullcast and QuotaPath stood in it.

Both were the first choice

1 of 12 modelsThe answer named them together, and the judge labeled each a first choice.
Mistral SmallFullcast, QuotaPath alternatives: Anaplan Territory & Quota Planning, Everstage, Varicent

Fullcast first, QuotaPath an alternative

5 of 12 modelsQuotaPath was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Gemini 3.5 FlashFullcast alternatives: CaptivateIQ, Pigment, QuotaPath, Salesforce Maps, Salesforce Sales Planning
Perplexity SonarFullcast alternatives: CaptivateIQ
DeepSeek V4 FlashFullcast alternatives: CaptivateIQ, Salesforce Sales Planning + Territory Management
Kimi K2Fullcast, Pigment alternatives: CaptivateIQ
GLM 4.7 FlashXFullcast alternatives: Salesforce Sales Planning / Territory Planning Add-On, Vena

Neither was the first choice, one was named

3 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Claude Haiku 4.5CaptivateIQ Planning alternatives: Clari Align, Fullcast, eSpatial
Grok 4.1 FastCaptivateIQ alternatives: Everstage, Fullcast, Salesforce Maps, Salesforce Sales Planning, eSpatial
MiniMax M2.5CaptivateIQ alternatives: Fullcast, SalesRabbit, Varicent

Neither was named

3 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
GPT-5.4 miniCaptivateIQ Planning alternatives: Salesforce Sales Planning / Territory Planning, Xactly
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice
Qwen 3.7 FlashCaptivateIQ alternatives: SalesRabbit, Territory Helper

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
QuotaPath leads by twenty points.
QuotaPath22%#1 of 13
Fullcast2%#8 of 13
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
The order flips: Fullcast leads at mid-market.
Fullcast18%#2 of 11
QuotaPath4%#3 of 11
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Fullcast leads by two points.
Fullcast4%#4 of 10
QuotaPath2%#– of 10
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Fullcast

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.

“Mid-market RevOps tools (~$20K+/year or $2,400+/user/year).” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“start at $20K–$60K/year — likely out of budget range” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · soft negative
“the strongest overall fit is usually Fullcast if you need territory planning and quota planning together in one RevOps workflow” Perplexity Sonar · direct prompt · first choice
“For most mid-market B2B companies using Salesforce, Fullcast is the most purpose-built and operationally impactful choice.” Kimi K2 · direct prompt · first choice
“Fullcast is the industry standard... handles the daily routing, carving, and Salesforce sync better than any other tool” Gemini 3.5 Flash · direct prompt · first choice

What the models said about QuotaPath

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.

“Accessible pricing (~$35/user/mo) ... but light on territory design/capacity modeling.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · direct prompt · soft negative
“Fullcast (if Salesforce-native) or QuotaPath (for best value and flexibility) would be the strongest choices” Mistral Small · direct prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend QuotaPath or CaptivateIQ for a mid-sized B2B company” GLM 4.7 FlashX · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Also compared
CaptivateIQ vs FullcastCaptivateIQ vs QuotaPathThe full territory planning standing

Comparisons are drawn for the top three products in each category. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.