Territory and quota planning · October 2026 Edition
Everstage vs Maptive
Zero of fourteen models named Everstage first on the direct prompt; zero named Maptive. Everstage was named by eleven of the fourteen models and Maptive by eight and Everstage carries 12 labels and Maptive 11, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in four categories this edition.
Named in two categories this edition.
First-choice share6%6%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%18%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#2#3A position in a field of 11; printed, not drawn.
Labels1211A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Everstage reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.CaptivateIQ Planning was named alongside these two in nine of the fourteen direct answers. CaptivateIQ Planning vs Everstage · CaptivateIQ Planning vs Maptive · Everstage vs Fullcast
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the territory and quota planning page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
EverstageFirst choices, of fourteen modelsMaptive
Direct00
Paraphrase30
Comparative00
Budget-constrained03
Scale-constrained00
Negative002 against Maptive
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Everstage and Maptive stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | |||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | |||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | ||||
| Grok 4.20 | | | ||||
| Mistral Small | | | ||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | |||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | |||||
| Kimi K2 | | |||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | |||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | |||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | |
Everstage Maptive first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Everstage on the left and Maptive on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Everstage and Maptive stood in it.
Neither was the first choice, one was named
1 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.GLM 4.7 FlashXCaptivateIQ Planning alternatives: Everstage, Fullcast, QuotaPath
Neither was named
13 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Claude Haiku 4.5CaptivateIQ Planning alternatives: BitScale, Fullcast, Salesforce Sales Planning, eSpatial
GPT-5.4 miniXactly alternatives: Anaplan Territory & Quota Planning, Fullcast
Gemini 3.5 FlashFullcast alternatives: CaptivateIQ Planning, Lative, QuotaPath, Xactly AlignStar
Perplexity SonarCaptivateIQ Planning alternatives: Fullcast, Pigment
Grok 4.20CaptivateIQ Planning alternatives: Anaplan Territory & Quota Planning, Outreach, SAP Territory and Quota, Salesforce Maps, eSpatial
Mistral SmallPigment alternatives: Anaplan Territory & Quota Planning, Aviso
DeepSeek V4 FlashCaptivateIQ Planning alternatives: Fullcast, Vena
Llama 4 MaverickZoomInfo's Planning product alternatives: CaptivateIQ Planning, Guideflow, Prospeo
Qwen 3.7 FlashRepertoire AI alternatives: Clari Copilot
Kimi K2CaptivateIQ Planning alternatives: Varicent Territory and Quota Planning, eSpatial
MiniMax M2.5no first choice
GPT-6 LunaFullcast Plan alternatives: Salesforce Sales Planning / Territory Planning, Xactly
Muse Glimmer 30BCaptivateIQ Planning alternatives: Revcast, Vena
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Mid-marketThe figures above
Level: the same share of first choices.
Everstage6%#2 of 11Maptive6%#3 of 11Enterprise
What the models said about Everstage
No label in this category carried a quote.
What the models said about Maptive
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.
“When to Avoid: If your sales structure is based on industry verticals, company size, or intent data rather than geography.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“good for basic mapping but limited in complex territory balancing and quota workflows” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Maptive stands out as one of the best affordable sales territory and quota planning tools” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · first choice
“Top Recommendation: Maptive (Best overall for limited budgets)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“Top Recommendation: Maptive” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
Also compared
CaptivateIQ Planning vs EverstageCaptivateIQ Planning vs MaptiveEverstage vs FullcastEverstage vs QuotaPathEverstage vs XactlyEverstage vs Salesforce Sales PlanningEverstage vs Anaplan Territory & Quota PlanningMaptive vs FullcastMaptive vs QuotaPathMaptive vs XactlyMaptive vs Salesforce Sales PlanningMaptive vs Anaplan Territory & Quota PlanningAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full territory planning standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.