Every category where a model named Badger Maps for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Territory and quota planning	Revenue operations	0%	25 of 103	10%	10	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Badger Maps yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Badger Maps across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	1	1
Mistral Small	1	0	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	2	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	2	0	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct7 labels1

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative8 labels2not counted in share

Budget-constrained11 labels1

Scale-constrained3 labelsNone

Negative13 labels2not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative42 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 6 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best low-cost field-sales tool: Badger Maps, especially for smaller field teams” Perplexity Sonar · Territory planning · budget prompt · alternative

“Focused on field execution? → Badger Maps or SPOTIO” Mistral Small · Territory planning · comparative prompt · alternative

“Badger Maps (outside field routing)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Territory planning · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Mapping-only tools (e.g., Badger Maps, Plotly): Lack quota/capacity modeling; "no native territory module."” Grok 4.1 Fast · Territory planning · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Badger Maps, over the 42 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Badger Maps was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Maptive27 of 421Not in the top three

Fullcast25 of 426Not in the top three

Anaplan25 of 422Not in the top three

eSpatial25 of 421Not in the top three

Varicent24 of 421Not in the top three

CaptivateIQ22 of 422Not in the top three

Salesforce Maps17 of 420Not in the top three

Spotio17 of 420Not in the top three

QuotaPath15 of 424Not in the top three

MapBusinessOnline14 of 421Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Badger Maps. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 5 of the 42 answers that named Badger Maps and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

guideflow.com5

pipeline.zoominfo.com5

captivateiq.com4

fitsmallbusiness.com4

maptive.com4

salesmotion.io4

worldmetrics.org4

zipdo.co4

articsledge.com3

cleverly.co3

Forty of the forty domain citations in answers naming Badger Maps came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

pipeline.zoominfo.com/sales/sales-territory-management-software5

captivateiq.com/blog/territory-planning-software-20264

fitsmallbusiness.com/territory-management-software4

maptive.com/15-best-sales-territory-mapping-software4

worldmetrics.org/best/territory-planning-software4

articsledge.com/post/territory-planning-software3

cleverly.co/blog/sales-territory-mapping-software3

guideflow.com/blog/sales-territory-management-software3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Badger Maps's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Badger Maps, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at badgermaps.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.