GTM AI Index

Index › Vendors › SalesRabbit · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

SalesRabbit

12Judge labels

1First choices

3Negative labels

10 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

7 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. SalesRabbit was named 7 times in Territory planning, where CaptivateIQ led with 30%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business14 of 121

under the label threshold

Mid-market59 of 103

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In territory planning · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named SalesRabbit for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Territory and quota planning	Revenue operations	0%	59 of 103	29%	7	under 10 labels · led by CaptivateIQ at 30%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for SalesRabbit yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated SalesRabbit across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	0	1
Kimi K2	1	0	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct3 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained4 labels1

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative3 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative12 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Leading candidates to shortlist: CaptivateIQ, Fullcast, Varicent, or SalesRabbit” Kimi K2 · Territory planning · scale prompt · alternative

“SalesRabbit focuses heavily on the logic behind *how* an account gets assigned.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Territory planning · direct prompt · alternative

“SalesRabbit is also a strong contender” MiniMax M2.5 · Territory planning · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Map-Only Tools (e.g., SalesRabbit) Use with caution, especially for B2B or complex hierarchies” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Territory planning · negative prompt · hard negative

“High Caution / Avoid ... Technical instability is the #1 complaint” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Territory planning · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as SalesRabbit, over the 12 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SalesRabbit was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

CaptivateIQ7 of 124Not in the top three

Fullcast5 of 121Not in the top three

Maptive5 of 120Not in the top three

Varicent5 of 120Not in the top three

Apptivo4 of 121Not in the top three

Anaplan4 of 120Not in the top three

QuotaPath3 of 121Not in the top three

Badger Maps3 of 120Not in the top three

MapBusinessOnline3 of 120Not in the top three

Pipedrive3 of 120Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SalesRabbit. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 12 answers that named SalesRabbit and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

captivateiq.com2

fitsmallbusiness.com2

guideflow.com2

maptive.com2

pipedrive.com2

pipeline.zoominfo.com2

zipdo.co2

emasterlabs.com1

espatial.com1

forma.ai1

Seventeen of the seventeen domain citations in answers naming SalesRabbit came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

captivateiq.com/blog/territory-planning-software-20262

fitsmallbusiness.com/territory-management-software2

maptive.com/15-best-sales-territory-mapping-software2

pipedrive.com/en/blog/sales-territory-management-tools2

pipeline.zoominfo.com/sales/sales-territory-management-software2

captivateiq.com/blog/sales-quota-management-software1

captivateiq.com/blog/sales-territory-mapping-software1

emasterlabs.com/sales-territory-management-software1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SalesRabbit's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SalesRabbit, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at salesrabbit.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.