GTM AI Index

Index › Products › Leadbeam · October 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Leadbeam

20Judge labels

1First choices

2Negative labels

10 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

5 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Leadbeam was named 5 times in Field sales, where Badger Maps led with 38%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business15 of 84

under the label threshold

Mid-market84 of 94

under the label threshold

Enterprise9 of 112

under the label threshold

In field sales · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Leadbeam for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Field sales tools	Sales	0%	84 of 94	40%	5	under 10 labels · led by Badger Maps at 38%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Leadbeam yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Leadbeam across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	2	0	0	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct3 labels1

Paraphrase2 labelsNone

Comparative8 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained4 labelsNone

Negative2 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative20 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best AI-Powered Modern Option: Leadbeam” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Field sales · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Best AI-Driven Administrative Companion” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Field sales · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Enterprise-focused ($149–$229/user/mo); overkill for small teams” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Field sales · budget prompt · hard negative

“Leadbeam lists native two-way sync with Pipedrive, HubSpot, Zoho, Close, Attio, Less Annoying CRM, Zendesk Sell and GoHighLevel, but no Salesforce connector.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Field sales · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Leadbeam, over the 20 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Leadbeam was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Badger Maps16 of 206Not among the top eight

Spotio14 of 204Not among the top eight

Map My Customers11 of 201Not among the top eight

SalesRabbit7 of 200Not among the top eight

Salesforce Maps7 of 200Not among the top eight

Geopointe4 of 200Not among the top eight

Salesforce Sales Cloud3 of 201Not among the top eight

RepMove3 of 200Not among the top eight

Salesforce Field Service2 of 201Not among the top eight

HubSpot Sales Hub2 of 200Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Leadbeam. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 20 of the 20 answers that named Leadbeam and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

spotio.com17

leadbeam.aiYour site13

pipelinecrm.com11

g2.com10

mapmycustomers.com10

lead-mapper.com7

guideflow.com5

croclub.com4

ecanvasser.com4

sellingsignals.com4

Seventy-two of the eighty-five domain citations in answers naming Leadbeam came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

pipelinecrm.com/blog/best-field-sales-crm10

spotio.com/blog/enterprise-sales-software9

mapmycustomers.com/blog/best-field-sales-software8

g2.com/categories/field-sales7

leadbeam.ai/blog/field-sales-apps6

spotio.com/blog/field-sales-management-software6

guideflow.com/blog/best-field-sales-software5

lead-mapper.com/blog/best-field-sales-software5

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

leadbeam.ai ranks 6 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Leadbeam takes 0% of first choices and Badger Maps takes 38%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “field sales tool”

Position for “best field sales tool”

–

not in the top ten

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 84 of 94 in field sales

Segment leader

38%

Badger Maps

First choices: 1 across its categories
Named in: 20 answers
Its own site cited: in 20 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Follow Leadbeam

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Leadbeam's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Leadbeam, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Leadbeam by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Leadbeam is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Leadbeam, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.