GTM AI Index

Index › Products › RepMove · October 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

RepMove

15Judge labels

2First choices

1Negative labels

8 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

6 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. RepMove was named 6 times in Field sales, where Badger Maps led with 38%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business9 of 84

under the label threshold

Mid-market9 of 94

under the label threshold

Enterprise85 of 112

under the label threshold

In field sales · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named RepMove for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Field sales tools	Sales	2%	9 of 94	17%	6	under 10 labels · led by Badger Maps at 38%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for RepMove yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated RepMove across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	1	0	0	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	1	0	1	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 label1

Paraphrase3 labelsNone

Comparative6 labelsNone

Budget-constrained3 labels1

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative2 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative15 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“RepMove — Best Overall Budget Option” Kimi K2 · Field sales · budget prompt · first choice

“RepMove is a strong low-cost option at $16.67/user/month annually” Perplexity Sonar · Field sales · budget prompt · alternative

“most capable free plan for individual field reps” Muse Glimmer 30B · Field sales · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“RepMove 4.9 from 17 reviews ... the two highest G2 scores rest on the two smallest review counts” Muse Glimmer 30B · Field sales · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as RepMove, over the 15 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and RepMove was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Badger Maps13 of 155Not among the top eight

Map My Customers9 of 151Not among the top eight

Spotio8 of 152Not among the top eight

HubSpot Sales Hub6 of 152Not among the top eight

SalesRabbit6 of 150Not among the top eight

Skynamo4 of 150Not among the top eight

Leadbeam3 of 150Not among the top eight

Salesforce Maps3 of 150Not among the top eight

HubSpot CRM2 of 151Not among the top eight

Lead Mapper2 of 151Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named RepMove. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 15 of the 15 answers that named RepMove and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

mapmycustomers.com13

spotio.com11

guideflow.com8

g2.com7

badgermapping.com6

lead-mapper.com6

pipelinecrm.com6

simplydepo.com6

prospeo.io5

leadbeam.ai4

Seventy-two of the seventy-two domain citations in answers naming RepMove came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

mapmycustomers.com/blog/best-field-sales-software10

guideflow.com/blog/best-field-sales-software8

lead-mapper.com/blog/best-field-sales-software6

pipelinecrm.com/blog/best-field-sales-crm6

g2.com/categories/field-sales5

guideflow.com/blog/field-sales-software4

spotio.com/blog/ai-sales-tools4

spotio.com/blog/field-sales-management-software4

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

repmove.app ranks 3 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, RepMove takes 2% of first choices and Badger Maps takes 38%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “field sales tool”

Position for “best field sales tool”

–

not in the top ten

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 9 of 94 in field sales

Segment leader

38%

Badger Maps

First choices: 2 across its categories
Named in: 15 answers
Its own site cited: in 15 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on repmove.app

234

subdomains included

Content

140

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

0 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	115	22	2026-10-05	CRM
Case study	9	1	2026-07-23
News or press	5	0	2026-02-23
Template or tool	4	0	2025-11-15	CRM
Comparison	3	0	2026-02-13	CRM
Glossary or explainer	2	undated
Webinar or virtual event	1	0	2025-02-10
Podcast or video	1	undated

Most recent

2026-10-05Crm for fastener guide blog
2026-10-02Crm for hvac guide blog
2026-09-25B2b sales tools guide blog
2026-09-16Proven outside sales strategies blog
2026-09-15Picking a crm for distribution companies blog
2026-09-10How to sell medical equipment guide blog

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page repmove.app exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name CRM (12); 0 name the category the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Names read as RepMove

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as RepMove; a claim can dispute any of them.

Repmove 1

Follow RepMove

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

RepMove is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: Outside Sales Management Platform
repmove.app
For: B2B teams that sell in the field
repmove.app
Price stated: Flex: $16.67 user / month billed annually; Sales Pro: $54 user / month billed annually; Accelerate: $80 user / month billed annually; Sales Pro: $56.99 user / month billed quarterly; Accelerate: $83.99 user / month billed quarterly; Flex: $19.99 user / month billed monthly; Sales Pro: $59.99 user / month billed monthly; Accelerate: $87.99 user / month billed monthly repmove.app/pricing-plans
Starting price: 16.67 repmove.app/pricing-plans
Free plan or trial: Try RepMove free for 7 days. No credit card required repmove.app
Certifications: HIPAA Compliance
Customers named: On Time SupplyArvada Rent-AllsRainier SurgicalRP RentsVoluntary Insurance PartnersTim TefftJeff PadillaAaron Berger
Not stated on the pages read: Integrations, hosting

What RepMove's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: repmove.app, repmove.app/pricing-plans, repmove.app/use-cases, repmove.app/customer-stories, repmove.app/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when RepMove's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as RepMove, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for RepMove by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where RepMove is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name RepMove, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.