GTM AI Index

Index › Products › Lead Mapper · October 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Lead Mapper

7Judge labels

1First choices

1Negative labels

5 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

5 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Lead Mapper was named 5 times in Field sales, where Badger Maps led with 38%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business23 of 84

under the label threshold

Mid-market11 of 94

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In field sales · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Lead Mapper for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Field sales tools	Sales	2%	11 of 94	20%	5	under 10 labels · led by Badger Maps at 38%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Lead Mapper yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Lead Mapper across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	0	1	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	1	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative2 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained3 labels1

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative7 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Top Budget-Friendly Pick: Lead Mapper — ~$27/user/month” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Field sales · budget prompt · first choice

“If visual territory planning is your biggest pain point, Lead Mapper provides excellent map-based visibility” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Field sales · comparative prompt · alternative

“Lead Mapper at $27/user/mo with no-card trial” Muse Glimmer 30B · Field sales · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Some field sales platforms (like Lead-Mapper, per research) refuse to publish pricing and offer no free trial” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Field sales · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Lead Mapper, over the 7 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Lead Mapper was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Map My Customers4 of 71Not among the top eight

Spotio4 of 71Not among the top eight

SalesRabbit4 of 70Not among the top eight

HubSpot Sales Hub3 of 71Not among the top eight

Badger Maps3 of 70Not among the top eight

FieldPie2 of 70Not among the top eight

Pipedrive2 of 70Not among the top eight

Pipeline CRM2 of 70Not among the top eight

RepMove2 of 70Not among the top eight

Salesforce Maps2 of 70Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Lead Mapper. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 7 of the 7 answers that named Lead Mapper and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

lead-mapper.comYour site7

mapmycustomers.com6

spotio.com6

g2.com5

guideflow.com4

pipelinecrm.com4

croclub.com3

bardeen.ai2

fitsmallbusiness.com2

folk.app2

Thirty-four of the forty-one domain citations in answers naming Lead Mapper came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

lead-mapper.com/blog/best-field-sales-software6

g2.com/categories/field-sales5

mapmycustomers.com/blog/best-field-sales-software5

pipelinecrm.com/blog/best-field-sales-crm4

croclub.com/tools/best-field-sales-software3

guideflow.com/blog/field-sales-software3

spotio.com/blog/field-sales-management-software3

bardeen.ai/best/field-sales-software2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on lead-mapper.com

subdomains included

Content

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

0 · 9

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest
Blog	7	6	2026-10-02
Comparison	6	5	2026-09-08
Glossary or explainer	2	2	2026-08-28
Template or tool	1	1	2026-09-27

Most recent

2026-10-02Map my customers pricing blog
2026-09-27Field sales software cost calculator template or tool
2026-09-11Field sales software ratings gap blog
2026-09-08Outside sales vs inside sales comparison
2026-09-07Sales call report template blog
2026-09-03Salesrabbit alternatives comparison

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page lead-mapper.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read October 5, 2026.

Names read as Lead Mapper

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Lead Mapper; a claim can dispute any of them.

Lead-Mapper 1

Follow Lead Mapper

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Lead Mapper is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: Field sales software for route planning, territory mapping, and lead prospecting. Built for field sales and field service teams.
lead-mapper.com
For: field sales and field service teams
lead-mapper.com
Price stated: $27 per user / month; Most popular Lead Mapper AI $47 per user / month lead-mapper.com
Starting price: 27 lead-mapper.com
Free plan or trial: Free trial, no credit card lead-mapper.com
Integrations claimed: 4 lead-mapper.com · 8 lead-mapper.com/integrations pages disagree
Not stated on the pages read: Certifications, hosting, customers

What Lead Mapper's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: lead-mapper.com, lead-mapper.com/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Lead Mapper's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Lead Mapper, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Lead Mapper by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Lead Mapper is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Lead Mapper, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.