Index › Products › Geopointe · October 2026 Edition

2 categories · Named, not ranked

Geopointe

21Judge labels

1First choices

5Negative labels

8 / 14Models named it

2Categories

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

8 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Geopointe was named 8 times in Field sales and 1 other category, where Badger Maps led with 38%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business31 of 84

under the label threshold

Mid-market27 of 94

under the label threshold

Enterprise11 of 112

under the label threshold

In field sales · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Geopointe for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Field sales tools	Sales	0%	27 of 94	25%	4	under 10 labels · led by Badger Maps at 38%
Territory and quota planning	Revenue operations	0%	60 of 123	25%	4	under 10 labels · led by CaptivateIQ Planning at 36%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Geopointe yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Geopointe across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	1	0	1	2
Gemini 3.5 Flash	3	1	0	4
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.20	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct3 labelsNone

Paraphrase3 labelsNone

Comparative7 labelsNone

Budget-constrained5 labels1

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative21 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Map-First / Outside Sales | Salesforce Maps, Maptive, Geopointe” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Territory planning · scale prompt · alternative

“Best for Deep CRM Integration (Particularly Salesforce): Geopointe” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Field sales · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“best if you're already deeply invested in Salesforce” GPT-5.4 mini · Field sales · direct prompt · alternative

“Geopointe is a highly popular choice.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Field sales · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“$225+/month, best left to larger orgs already on Salesforce” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Field sales · budget prompt · hard negative

“territory-mapping/geo-planning tools on AppExchange, but pricing is not as transparently low as the simplest options” GPT-5.4 mini · Territory planning · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Geopointe, over the 21 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Geopointe was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Badger Maps15 of 216Not among the top eight

Salesforce Maps13 of 212Not among the top eight

Spotio12 of 213Not among the top eight

Map My Customers8 of 213Not among the top eight

Anaplan Territory & Quota Planning5 of 211Not among the top eight

Fullcast5 of 211Not among the top eight

CaptivateIQ Planning5 of 210Not among the top eight

Maptive4 of 211Not among the top eight

Leadbeam4 of 210Not among the top eight

eSpatial4 of 210Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Geopointe. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 21 of the 21 answers that named Geopointe and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

captivateiq.com13

spotio.com11

pipelinecrm.com9

sellingsignals.com8

g2.com7

mapmycustomers.com7

guideflow.com6

leadbeam.ai6

badgermapping.com5

gitnux.org5

No domain is on file for Geopointe, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

pipelinecrm.com/blog/best-field-sales-crm9

captivateiq.com/blog/sales-territory-mapping-software7

mapmycustomers.com/blog/best-field-sales-software5

sellingsignals.com/best-field-sales-software5

spotio.com/blog/enterprise-sales-software5

abacum.ai/blog/sales-planning-software4

captivateiq.com/blog/sales-quota-management-software4

captivateiq.com/blog/territory-planning-software-20264

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Geopointe

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Geopointe; a claim can dispute any of them.

Salesforce Maps/Geopointe 1

Follow Geopointe

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Geopointe's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Geopointe, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Geopointe by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Geopointe is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Geopointe, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.