Every category where a model named MapBusinessOnline for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Territory and quota planning	Revenue operations	2%	12 of 103	12%	8	under 10 labels · led by CaptivateIQ at 30%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for MapBusinessOnline yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated MapBusinessOnline across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	0	0	1
Mistral Small	0	1	0	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	0	1	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	1	0	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct8 labels2

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative6 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained12 labels2

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative29 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“add a low-cost mapping tool (like MapBusinessOnline or Mapline)... Excellent value for SMBs” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Territory planning · budget prompt · first choice

“Affordable annual flat rate; full territory hierarchy, balancing by sales/demographics, routing. Great for SMBs” Grok 4.1 Fast · Territory planning · budget prompt · alternative

“Apptivo or MapBusinessOnline — Full territory management features at low cost” MiniMax M2.5 · Territory planning · budget prompt · alternative

“Pros: Genuine territory features at low cost, web-based” Mistral Small · Territory planning · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Mapping-first tools with algorithmic territory balancing at lower cost, but no quota or capacity planning” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Territory planning · direct prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as MapBusinessOnline, over the 29 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and MapBusinessOnline was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Maptive22 of 293Not in the top three

eSpatial16 of 293Not in the top three

Badger Maps14 of 293Not in the top three

Salesforce Maps14 of 290Not in the top three

CaptivateIQ12 of 291Not in the top three

Mapline11 of 293Not in the top three

QuotaPath11 of 293Not in the top three

Fullcast11 of 291Not in the top three

Varicent11 of 291Not in the top three

Anaplan9 of 291Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named MapBusinessOnline. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 29 answers that named MapBusinessOnline and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

articsledge.com1

bitscale.ai1

capterra.com1

captivateiq.com1

everstage.com1

g2.com1

gitnux.org1

gradient.works1

guideflow.com1

pipeline.zoominfo.com1

Ten of the ten domain citations in answers naming MapBusinessOnline came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

articsledge.com/post/territory-planning-software1

bitscale.ai/blogs/best-territory-planning-tools1

capterra.com/p/123834/eSpatial1

capterra.com/p/124748/Map-Business-Online/reviews1

capterra.com/p/203718/QuotaPath/reviews1

capterra.com/p/215948/OALLEY1

capterra.com/p/93335/Maptitude1

capterra.com/sales-performance-management-software1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as MapBusinessOnline

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as MapBusinessOnline; a claim can dispute any of them.

MapBusinessOnline Standard 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when MapBusinessOnline's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as MapBusinessOnline, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at mapbusinessonline.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.